Para muchos de nosotros, la Biblia es una fuente de consuelo, gu\u00eda y verdad que cambia la vida. La sostenemos en nuestras manos, sentimos su peso familiar y pasamos sus p\u00e1ginas para escuchar la voz de Dios. Pero, \u00bfalguna vez te has detenido a preguntarte sobre el incre\u00edble viaje que este libro ha realizado a trav\u00e9s de la historia? \u00bfC\u00f3mo se unieron estas cartas, profec\u00edas e historias espec\u00edficas para formar el \u00fanico volumen que apreciamos hoy? Esta pregunta no es una raz\u00f3n para dudar; es una hermosa invitaci\u00f3n de Dios a ver Su mano fiel obrando a lo largo de miles de a\u00f1os.<\/p>\n
La Biblia no cay\u00f3 del cielo, completa y encuadernada en cuero. Tampoco fue ensamblada por un comit\u00e9 secreto en una habitaci\u00f3n oscura. La verdad es mucho m\u00e1s maravillosa. La Biblia es una biblioteca divina, una colecci\u00f3n de libros sagrados escritos a lo largo de 1.500 a\u00f1os por m\u00e1s de 40 autores diferentes, todos inspirados por Dios.\u00b9 La historia de c\u00f3mo estos libros fueron reunidos y reconocidos por el pueblo de Dios se llama la historia del<\/p>\n
canon<\/strong>. Es una de las historias m\u00e1s poderosas y que m\u00e1s fortalecen la fe en la historia, revelando a un Dios que no solo habla Su Palabra, sino que tambi\u00e9n la preserva cuidadosamente para Sus hijos.<\/p>\n This article will take you on that journey. We will explore what the \"canon\" is, how the Old Testament was formed and trusted by Jesus Himself, what prompted the need for a New Testament, and how the early guided by the Holy Spirit, recognized the books that would shape lives for millennia.<\/p>\n To understand how the Bible was put together, we first need to understand the word \"canon.\" The term comes from the Greek word kan\u014dn<\/em>, which originally meant a \"reed\" or a \"measuring stick\".\u00b3 In the ancient world, a reed was a tool for measuring, a standard of straightness and accuracy. For early Christians, this word became the perfect metaphor for the collection of books that \"measured up\" to the standard of being God's inspired and authoritative Word. The canon is the official list of books that serve as our \"rule of faith and life\".\u2075<\/p>\n It\u2019s essential to remember that the Bible is not a single book but a library\u2014an anthology of writings that tell one grand, overarching story of God's redemption.\u00b2 Protestant Bibles contain 66 distinct books, written in various genres like history, poetry, law, prophecy, and personal letters, by a diverse group of people over many centuries.\u00b2 The canon is simply the recognized collection of these specific books.<\/p>\n This leads to one of the most important and faith-building truths about the Bible's formation. The Church did not crea<\/em> el canon en el sentido de que hecho<\/em> ciertos libros como santos. M\u00e1s bien, a trav\u00e9s de un largo proceso de uso en oraci\u00f3n y discernimiento guiado por el Esp\u00edritu, reconocido<\/em> la autoridad divina que ya estaba presente en estos escritos inspirados por Dios.\u2074 Los libros fueron incluidos en el canon porque fueron inspirados por Dios; no fueron inspirados por Dios porque fueron incluidos en el canon.\u00b9\u2070 Esta poderosa distinci\u00f3n rechaza la idea c\u00ednica de que la Biblia fue simplemente una invenci\u00f3n humana creada para consolidar el poder.\u00b9\u00b9 Dios fue el autor, y Su pueblo fue quien reconoci\u00f3 Su voz.<\/p>\n The very idea of a \"canon\" as a fixed measuring stick implies a finished and complete collection. The process of canonization was a process of closing the list of authoritative books to clearly distinguish God's Word from the many other religious writings that were circulating at the time.\u2078 For the Christian holding a Bible today, this provides a powerful sense of security. The Bible is not an open-ended collection that might change tomorrow. It is a complete and finished revelation, a \"faith that was once for all delivered to the saints,\" a sacred trust we can depend on completely.\u00b9\u2070<\/p>\n The Old Testament did not appear all at once. Its 39 books were written over a vast stretch of time, more than a thousand years from roughly 1400 B.C. To 400 B.C..\u00b9\u2070 The process of its recognition as Scripture began with its very first writings. Foundational texts, like the Law of Moses (the Torah or Pentateuch), were accepted as God's Word from the moment they were written. The book of Deuteronomy even records Moses commanding the Levites to place \"this Book of the Law\u2026beside the ark of the covenant of the LORD\" as a permanent witness.\u00b9\u2074<\/p>\n A beautiful clue to its formation lies in the traditional three-part structure used by the Jewish people: The Law (Torah), the Prophets (Nevi'im), and the Writings (Ketuvim).\u2076 This division likely reflects the historical stages of how these collections were recognized as sacred. The Law was accepted by the 5th century B.C.; the Prophets were gathered and accepted next, by the 3rd or 2nd century B.C.; and finally, the Writings were fully recognized by the time of Jesus and the early church in the 1st century A.D..\u2077<\/p>\n By the time Jesus was born in Bethlehem, the canon of the Old Testament was already settled and accepted. We have powerful evidence for this. The first-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus described a canon of 22 books (which corresponds to our 39 books, as some were grouped together, like 1 and 2 Kings) and stated that \"no one has been so bold as either to add anything to them, or take anything from them, or to make any change in them\" for many centuries.\u00b9\u00b2 the existence of the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures made around 250-200 B.C., shows that these books were already revered and needed to be made accessible to the wider, Greek-speaking Jewish world.\u2076<\/p>\n For a long time, it was thought that a \"Council of Jamnia\" around A.D.\u2079\u2070 formally closed the Jewish canon. While scholars today see this less as a single, decisive council and more as a confirmation of what was already universally accepted, it still points to the same truth: the Old Testament canon was firmly in place by the first century.\u2076<\/p>\n This stability is a powerful anchor for our faith. The Old Testament was not a Christian invention or a collection of books retroactively assembled to fit a Christian story. It was the received Word of God, inherited directly from the Jewish faith. When Jesus and His disciples spoke of \"the Scriptures,\" they were referring to this known, established, and trusted body of work.\u00b9\u2075 This gives the Christian reader a powerful sense of continuity and historical rootedness, knowing that the foundation of their faith is not built on shifting sand but on the ancient and unchanging Word of God.<\/p>\n Aunque la evidencia hist\u00f3rica del canon del Antiguo Testamento es s\u00f3lida, la raz\u00f3n \u00faltima por la que los cristianos conf\u00edan en estos 39 libros es mucho m\u00e1s personal y poderosa: el mismo Jesucristo confi\u00f3 en ellos. A lo largo de Su ministerio, Jes\u00fas trat\u00f3 al Antiguo Testamento como la Palabra de Dios viva, activa e inquebrantable.<\/p>\n He quoted from it to defeat Satan in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1-11). He declared its divine authority when He said, \"Scripture cannot be broken\" (John 10:35). He taught that the entire Old Testament was ultimately about Him, telling the religious leaders, \"You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me\" (John 5:39).<\/p>\n The most powerful moment of affirmation came after His resurrection. Walking with two disciples on the road to Emmaus, Jesus opened their minds to understand the Bible. Beginning with \"the Law of Moses and all the Prophets,\" He interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself (Luke 24:27). Later, appearing to all the disciples, He gave His definitive stamp of approval on the entire collection, saying, \"Everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled\" (Luke 24:44).\u00b2 In that moment, Jesus personally ratified the complete three-part canon of the Old Testament that the Church would forever cherish.<\/p>\n The apostles followed their Master's lead without hesitation. Their preaching in the book of Acts and their letters to the churches are saturated with the Old Testament. They did not see their own message as something new, but as the fulfillment of everything God had promised in the Scriptures.\u00b9\u2077 In a remarkable passage, the apostle Peter refers to Paul's letters and puts them on the same level as the \"other Scriptures\" (2 Peter 3:15-16).\u00b2 This shows that from the very beginning, the apostles understood that God was creating a new body of inspired writings to stand alongside the Old Testament.<\/p>\n Para el cristiano, esto lo cambia todo. Nuestra confianza en el Antiguo Testamento no se basa solo en el consenso hist\u00f3rico, por fuerte que sea. Se basa en la autoridad divina de Jesucristo. Confiamos en el Antiguo Testamento porque Jes\u00fas confi\u00f3 en \u00e9l. Esto transforma una discusi\u00f3n acad\u00e9mica en una seguridad de fe profundamente personal.<\/p>\n In the first decades after Jesus's resurrection, the ultimate authority for Christians was not a book, but a person\u2014or rather, a group of people. The \"canon\" was the living, breathing testimony of the apostles, the men who had walked with Jesus, heard His teaching, and witnessed His return from the dead.\u2074 Their oral teaching was the final word. But as the Church grew and time passed, several critical challenges arose that created an urgent need to formally recognize a collection of written works.<\/p>\n Los ap\u00f3stoles y sus disc\u00edpulos comenzaron a fallecer. A medida que la generaci\u00f3n de testigos oculares se desvanec\u00eda, la Iglesia necesitaba un registro permanente, confiable e inmutable de su ense\u00f1anza para proteger la fe para todas las generaciones futuras.\u2074<\/p>\n La Iglesia enfrent\u00f3 oleadas de persecuci\u00f3n brutal. Bajo emperadores romanos como Diocleciano a principios del siglo IV, poseer las Escrituras cristianas era un delito capital.\u2074 Los creyentes se vieron obligados a decidir qu\u00e9 libros eran la verdadera Palabra de Dios \u2014dignos de sufrir y morir por ellos\u2014 y cu\u00e1les eran simplemente escritos \u00fatiles o devocionales. Esta situaci\u00f3n de vida o muerte hizo que la cuesti\u00f3n del canon fuera intensamente pr\u00e1ctica.<\/p>\n The most major catalyst, But was the rise of heresy. Around A.D. 140, a wealthy teacher named Marcion began to spread a dangerous teaching. He claimed that the God of the Old Testament was an evil, judgmental creator-god, and that Jesus had been sent by a different, loving God to save humanity from him.\u2074 To support his twisted theology, Marcion created his own \"bible.\" He threw out the entire Old Testament and compiled a canon consisting only of a heavily edited Gospel of Luke and ten of Paul's letters, from which he had surgically removed any positive reference to the Old Testament or Jesus's Jewish heritage.\u2074<\/p>\n Marcion's canon was a direct attack on the heart of the Christian faith. It forced the orthodox Church to stand up and respond by defining, with greater clarity than ever before, which books truly<\/em> llevaban la autoridad de los ap\u00f3stoles y representaban la \u00fanica fe verdadera.\u2074 El canon del Nuevo Testamento no se forj\u00f3 en los pasillos silenciosos de una biblioteca, sino en el fuego de la adversidad. Fue un acto necesario de defensa, una forma de proteger el precioso evangelio de Jesucristo de ser corrompido y perdido. En Su sabidur\u00eda, Dios us\u00f3 los mismos ataques de Sus enemigos para lograr Su prop\u00f3sito de preservar Su verdadera Palabra para siempre.<\/p>\n El proceso de reconocer los libros del Nuevo Testamento no fue como seguir una lista de verificaci\u00f3n r\u00edgida. Fue un discernimiento gradual, guiado por el Esp\u00edritu, que se desarroll\u00f3 a lo largo de los siglos, a medida que las iglesias de todo el mundo usaban, estudiaban y oraban sobre estos escritos. Al hacerlo, fueron guiados por tres principios fundamentales que les ayudaron a reconocer la voz aut\u00e9ntica de Dios.\u2074<\/p>\n totalidad<\/em> body of Christ, guiding all of God's people together toward a unified recognition of His Word.\u2079<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n These three principles are not an arbitrary list; they are deeply interconnected and flow from one foundational truth: Jesus Christ entrusted His message to His apostles. The apostles' connection to Jesus gives us the principle of Apostolicity<\/strong>. The apostles' core teaching gives us the principle of ortodoxia<\/strong>. Y la aceptaci\u00f3n universal de esa ense\u00f1anza por parte de las iglesias que fundaron los ap\u00f3stoles nos da el principio de Catholicity<\/strong>. This provides a powerful and logical answer to the question, \"How can we know they got it right?\" The process was not random. It was a coherent, Spirit-led effort to remain faithful to the person and teaching of Jesus, as passed down by His chosen messengers.<\/p>\n La historia del canon del Nuevo Testamento es una historia de consenso creciente, marcada por momentos clave y personas fieles a quienes Dios us\u00f3 para traer claridad a Su Iglesia.<\/p>\n Uno de los descubrimientos m\u00e1s emocionantes en la historia cristiana es un manuscrito latino andrajoso llamado Fragmento Muratoriano, encontrado en una biblioteca en Mil\u00e1n, Italia.\u00b2\u00b3 Aunque la copia en s\u00ed data del siglo VIII, los estudiosos creen que es una traducci\u00f3n de un documento griego mucho m\u00e1s antiguo de Roma, escrito alrededor del a\u00f1o 170-200 d.C.\u00b2\u00b3 Este fragmento contiene la lista m\u00e1s antigua conocida de libros del Nuevo Testamento. Incluso en esta fecha incre\u00edblemente temprana, afirma los cuatro Evangelios, los Hechos de los Ap\u00f3stoles, trece cartas de Pablo, Judas, 1 y 2 Juan y Apocalipsis: una colecci\u00f3n central notablemente cercana a nuestro Nuevo Testamento final.\u00b2\u2075 Tambi\u00e9n advierte expl\u00edcitamente contra los escritos her\u00e9ticos y los rechaza, mostrando que la Iglesia ya estaba discerniendo activamente entre evangelios verdaderos y falsos.\u00b2\u00b3<\/p>\n Athanasius was a bishop in Alexandria, Egypt, in the 4th century and a true hero of the faith. He spent his life courageously defending the truth that Jesus Christ is fully God against the widespread Arian heresy.\u00b2\u2076 In the year 367, as was the custom, Athanasius wrote an Easter letter to the churches under his care. In this 39th \"Festal Letter,\" he did something historic. For the first time, he listed the 27 books of the New Testament\u2014exactly the same 27 books we have in our Bibles today\u2014and declared them to be the exclusive \"springs of salvation\" and the sole canon of the faith.\u2075 This was not a new invention or a personal decree; it was Athanasius articulating the consensus that had been solidifying in the Church for generations, especially in the influential Christian center of Alexandria.\u00b2\u2076<\/p>\n Dios tambi\u00e9n utiliz\u00f3 mentes brillantes para ayudar a consolidar el canon. Alrededor del a\u00f1o 400 d.C., un gran erudito llamado Jer\u00f3nimo recibi\u00f3 el encargo de crear una traducci\u00f3n latina est\u00e1ndar de la Biblia, que lleg\u00f3 a conocerse como la Vulgata.\u00b2\u2079 Su trabajo fue monumental para dar forma a la Biblia de la iglesia occidental durante los siguientes mil a\u00f1os. Al mismo tiempo, Agust\u00edn de Hipona, quiz\u00e1s el te\u00f3logo m\u00e1s grande en la historia de la iglesia, fue una voz l\u00edder en varios concilios regionales de la iglesia en el norte de \u00c1frica, espec\u00edficamente en Hipona (393 d.C.) y Cartago (397 y 419 d.C.).\u00b3\u00b9 Estos concilios ratificaron formalmente el canon del Nuevo Testamento de 27 libros que Atanasio hab\u00eda enumerado.\u00b3\u00b3 No estaban creando algo nuevo, sino afirmando oficialmente la voluntad establecida de la Iglesia.<\/p>\n This historical progression shows the beautiful, organic way the Holy Spirit worked. It was not a power grab by one person or council. It was the across the world and across generations, coming to a unified mind about what constituted God's Holy Word. This builds our confidence that the New Testament we hold today is a gift from God, not just a decision of men.<\/p>\n La Iglesia Cat\u00f3lica remonta su comprensi\u00f3n del canon b\u00edblico a la misma historia temprana, se\u00f1alando los concilios de Roma (382 d.C.), Hipona (393 d.C.) y Cartago (397 d.C.) como momentos fundamentales en los que se afirm\u00f3 la lista de libros inspirados.\u00b3\u00b3 La principal diferencia entre las Biblias cat\u00f3lica y protestante radica en el Antiguo Testamento.<\/p>\n The Catholic Old Testament includes seven books\u2014Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (also called Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, and 1 and 2 Maccabees\u2014as well as longer versions of the books of Esther and Daniel. These are not found in the Protestant Old Testament.\u00b9\u00b2 Catholics refer to these books as the \"Deuterocanonical\" books, meaning \"second canon.\" This term does not imply they are less inspired, but simply acknowledges that their acceptance into the canon was debated for longer than the \"Protocanonical\" books of the Hebrew Bible.\u00b3\u2077 Protestants, generally following the scholarship of Jerome who preferred the original Hebrew canon, refer to these books as the \"Apocrypha,\" meaning \"hidden\".\u2076<\/p>\n Esta diferencia lleg\u00f3 a un punto cr\u00edtico durante la Reforma protestante en el siglo XVI. L\u00edderes como Mart\u00edn Lutero cuestionaron la autoridad de los libros deuterocan\u00f3nicos, en parte porque algunos pasajes se utilizaban para apoyar doctrinas cat\u00f3licas como las oraciones por los difuntos (que se encuentran en 2 Macabeos 12:46).\u2076<\/p>\n En respuesta, la Iglesia Cat\u00f3lica convoc\u00f3 el Concilio de Trento. En 1546, el concilio emiti\u00f3 un decreto formal, De Canonicis Scripturis<\/em>, que defini\u00f3 solemnemente el canon completo de 73 libros (46 en el Antiguo Testamento, 27 en el Nuevo) como un art\u00edculo de fe absoluto para todos los cat\u00f3licos.\u00b3\u2079 El concilio no se vio a s\u00ed mismo como<\/p>\n a\u00f1adiendo<\/em> these books to the Bible. Instead, it was definitively reaffirming the same list of books that had been included in the earlier councils of Rome, Hippo, and Florence (1442).\u00b3\u2075 Trent's decision was a powerful confirmation of a long-standing tradition in the face of a direct challenge.<\/p>\n Nota: El Tanaj jud\u00edo cuenta los libros de manera diferente (por ejemplo, los Doce Profetas Menores como un solo libro), lo que resulta en un total de 24 libros, pero el contenido es el mismo que el de los 39 libros del Antiguo Testamento protestante. Los c\u00e1nones ortodoxos pueden variar ligeramente, pero generalmente incluyen todos los libros enumerados.<\/em> 36<\/p>\n In recent years, there has been a lot of excitement about so-called \"lost books of the Bible.\" But this name is misleading. Books like the Gospel of Thomas were never \"lost\" and then found; scholars have known about them for centuries. They were not accidentally misplaced or maliciously hidden. They were prayerfully considered and intentionally rejected<\/em> por la Iglesia primitiva por razones muy v\u00e1lidas.\u2074\u00b2<\/p>\n El Evangelio de Tom\u00e1s es un estudio de caso perfecto. Es una colecci\u00f3n de 114 supuestos dichos de Jes\u00fas, pero no contiene ninguna historia de Su vida, Sus milagros, Su muerte o Su resurrecci\u00f3n.\u2074\u2075 Cuando la Iglesia primitiva examin\u00f3 este libro utilizando los principios rectores para la canonicidad, fall\u00f3 en todas y cada una de las pruebas.<\/p>\n Fall\u00f3 la prueba de Apostolicity<\/strong>. Aunque afirma haber sido escrito por el ap\u00f3stol Tom\u00e1s, los eruditos coinciden en que fue escrito muy tarde, probablemente a mediados o finales del siglo II (140-180 d.C.), mucho despu\u00e9s de que los ap\u00f3stoles hubieran muerto. La Iglesia primitiva lo reconoci\u00f3 universalmente como una falsificaci\u00f3n.\u2074\u2077<\/p>\n Y lo m\u00e1s importante, fall\u00f3 la prueba de ortodoxia<\/strong>. Its teachings are radically different from the four biblical Gospels. The Gospel of Thomas is a Gnostic text, reflecting a mystical worldview that was completely at odds with Christianity.\u2075\u2070 Gnosticism taught that salvation comes not through faith in Jesus's sacrifice, but through secret knowledge (<\/p>\n gnosis<\/em>).\u2075\u00b9 It viewed the physical world as an evil prison to be escaped, not as God's good creation to be redeemed.\u2075\u00b9 Some of its sayings are bizarre and contradict the character of Jesus, such as the claim that women must become male to enter the kingdom of heaven (Saying 114) or that fasting and prayer are sinful (Saying 14).\u2075\u2074<\/p>\n Finalmente, fall\u00f3 la prueba de Catholicity<\/strong>. El Evangelio de Tom\u00e1s nunca fue aceptado por la Iglesia universal. De hecho, los primeros padres de la iglesia como Ireneo y Eusebio lo condenaron expl\u00edcitamente como ficci\u00f3n her\u00e9tica. Nunca fue incluido en ninguna lista oficial de libros can\u00f3nicos.\u2074\u2079<\/p>\n La Iglesia primitiva rechaz\u00f3 el Evangelio de Tom\u00e1s no porque sus l\u00edderes tuvieran miedo de lo que dec\u00eda, sino porque sab\u00edan que no era la verdadera historia del Jes\u00fas que conoc\u00edan, amaban y adoraban. Presenta un Jes\u00fas diferente y un evangelio diferente. La elecci\u00f3n de excluirlo no fue un acto de censura, sino un acto de protecci\u00f3n espiritual. La Iglesia estaba defendiendo la verdad hist\u00f3rica y vivificante del evangelio de una filosof\u00eda que lo habr\u00eda convertido en un mito confuso y no hist\u00f3rico. Estaban protegiendo el tesoro, no ocultando la verdad.<\/p>\n The journey of the Bible into our hands is a breathtaking story of God's providence. We see the gradual unfolding of the Old Testament, a collection of Scriptures so trusted that it was ratified by Jesus Christ Himself. We see the birth of the New Testament from the apostles' testimony, forged in the fires of persecution and clarified by the challenges of heresy. We see the Holy Spirit guiding God's people all across the world, over hundreds of years, to recognize and affirm the same collection of books as His holy Word.<\/p>\n La formaci\u00f3n de la Biblia no fue un proceso fr\u00e1gil, fortuito o pol\u00edtico. Es un poderoso testimonio de un Dios que no solo inspira Su Palabra, sino que tambi\u00e9n la preserva fielmente. La pr\u00f3xima vez que tome su Biblia, sost\u00e9ngala con un renovado sentido de asombro y gratitud. No es solo un libro antiguo. Es una biblioteca divina, un dep\u00f3sito sagrado y la Palabra viva de Dios, entregada fielmente en sus manos por el Dios que le ama.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Descubre c\u00f3mo se form\u00f3 el canon de la Biblia y los eventos clave que dieron forma a su colecci\u00f3n a lo largo de la historia. \u00a1Aprende m\u00e1s!<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":54899,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-54762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-christian-education"],"mb":[],"acf":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/api.robolly.com\/templates\/656df2bd6a094828c339896d\/render.jpg?dl&scale=1&image=https%3A%2F%2Fchristianpure.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fblogimg%2FV7-1920%2F2%2FArchangels_in_triumphant_glory_in_the_style_of_Fer__00731.webp&titleBG=%23006073E6&title=How%20and%20when%20was%20the%20canon%20of%20the%20Bible%20put%20together%3F","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"mfb_rest_fields":["title","jetpack_publicize_connections","jetpack_featured_media_url","jetpack-related-posts","jetpack_sharing_enabled"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/api.robolly.com\/templates\/656df2bd6a094828c339896d\/render.jpg?dl&scale=1&image=https%3A%2F%2Fchristianpure.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fblogimg%2FV7-1920%2F2%2FArchangels_in_triumphant_glory_in_the_style_of_Fer__00731.webp&titleBG=%23006073E6&title=How%20and%20when%20was%20the%20canon%20of%20the%20Bible%20put%20together%3F","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54762\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54899"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54762"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christianpure.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=54762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\u00bfQu\u00e9 significa que la Biblia tenga un \"canon\"?<\/h2>\n
\u00bfC\u00f3mo se form\u00f3 y reconoci\u00f3 el Antiguo Testamento?<\/h2>\n
\u00bfC\u00f3mo ve\u00edan Jes\u00fas y los ap\u00f3stoles el Antiguo Testamento?<\/h2>\n
\u00bfQu\u00e9 dio origen a la necesidad de un canon del Nuevo Testamento?<\/h2>\n
\u00bfC\u00f3mo decidi\u00f3 la Iglesia primitiva qu\u00e9 libros pertenec\u00edan a ella?<\/h2>\n
\n
\u00bfQui\u00e9nes fueron las personas clave y cu\u00e1les fueron los momentos clave en la finalizaci\u00f3n del Nuevo Testamento?<\/h2>\n
Una instant\u00e1nea temprana: El Fragmento Muratoriano<\/h3>\n
El h\u00e9roe de la ortodoxia: Atanasio de Alejandr\u00eda<\/h3>\n
El erudito y el te\u00f3logo: Jer\u00f3nimo y Agust\u00edn<\/h3>\n
\u00bfCu\u00e1l es la postura de la Iglesia Cat\u00f3lica sobre el canon de la Biblia?<\/h2>\n
Comparaci\u00f3n de los c\u00e1nones del Antiguo Testamento<\/h3>\n
\n\n
\n \n\n Libro\n <\/th>\n \n Jud\u00edo (Tanaj)\n <\/th>\n \n Protestant OT\n <\/th>\n \n Catholic OT\n <\/th>\n \n Orthodox OT\n <\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n \n La Ley (Tor\u00e1\/Pentateuco)<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n G\u00e9nesis\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n \u00c9xodo\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Leviticus\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Numbers\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Deuteronomy\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Libros hist\u00f3ricos<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Josu\u00e9\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Jueces\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Rut\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n 1 y 2 Samuel\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n 1 y 2 Reyes\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n 1 y 2 Cr\u00f3nicas\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Ezra\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Nehemiah\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Tob\u00edas<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Judit<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Ester\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n Yes (longer)\n <\/td>\n \n Yes (longer)\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n 1 Macabeos<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n 2 Macabeos<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Wisdom Books<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Job\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Salmos\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed (m\u00e1s Salmo 151)\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Proverbios\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Ecclesiastes\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Song of Songs\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Sabidur\u00eda de Salom\u00f3n<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Sir\u00e1cida (Eclesi\u00e1stico)<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Libros prof\u00e9ticos<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Isaiah\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Jerem\u00edas\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Lamentations\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Baruc<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Ezequiel\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Daniel\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n Yes (longer)\n <\/td>\n \n Yes (longer)\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Los Doce (Profetas Menores)\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Libros ortodoxos adicionales<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n \n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n 1 y 2 Esdras<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Oraci\u00f3n de Manas\u00e9s<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n 3 y 4 Macabeos<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n No\n <\/td>\n \n S\u00ed<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Total Books<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n 24<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n 39<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n 46<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n \n ~51<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \u00bfPor qu\u00e9 libros como el Evangelio de Tom\u00e1s no est\u00e1n en la Biblia?<\/h2>\n
Un dep\u00f3sito sagrado, una Palabra duradera<\/h2>\n