Jesus asks with agapaō twice, then phileō. Peter answers with phileō every time.
| Speaker | в первую очередь | Second | Third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jesus asks | agapaō | agapaō | phileō |
| Peter answers | phileō | phileō | phileō |
Tap any word to see the Greek behind it.
Loading the passage…
Does the change of word matter? Scholars are divided.
Many older commentators saw a deliberate change. Most modern scholars read it as John’s style. Here is each side’s case, and the verses you can read for yourself.
Yes, John changes the word on purpose
Richard Chenevix Trench, 1880
Jesus’ agapaō sounded too cool to Peter, so Peter answered with the warmer, more personal phileō. The third time, Jesus took up Peter’s own word.
Synonyms of the New Testament, §12
B. F. Westcott, 1881
The other way round: agapaō is the higher love. After his denials, Peter claims only the natural affection he can be sure of, phileō.
Евангелие от Иоанна, on 21:15
Kenneth L. McKay, 1985
Read on its own, the passage looks as if a difference is meant, whatever words were actually spoken.
“Style and Significance in the Language of John 21:15–17,” Новый Завет 27 (1985), 319–33, at 324
Trench and Westcott agree the change matters, but not on which word is the warmer one.
No, John varies his words
Augustine of Hippo, about 420
Jesus’ two words mean one thing: Scripture does not separate these loves.
О граде Божьем 14.7, reading the Latin Bible’s diligis и amas
Raymond E. Brown, 1970
Most modern scholars treat the change as John’s style, not a difference in meaning.
The Gospel according to John XIII–XXI, Anchor Bible 29A, 1101
D. A. Carson, 1991
John uses the two verbs as close synonyms, as he varies the other pairs in these verses. By then agapaō was becoming the ordinary word for love, partly because phileō had come to mean “to kiss”.
The Gospel according to John, 676; Exegetical Fallacies, 2nd ed., 52
Read the verses yourself
The yes side points to one verse
The third question is the one that hurt Peter
It is also the question where Jesus takes up Peter’s word, phileō. The no side answers that the verse gives the reason itself: Jesus asked a third time.
The no side points to three things
John changes three other pairs of words here
Feed and shepherd, lambs and sheep, and two Greek verbs that English Bibles both give as “know”.
John uses both verbs for the same love
The Father’s love for the Son, Jesus’ love for Lazarus, and his love for the disciple he loved are each told with both words.
Both verbs can mean a love for the wrong thing
Carson adds Amnon, whose violent desire for his sister is agapaō in the Greek Old Testament (2 Samuel 13).
What both sides agree on
Peter denied Jesus three times by a charcoal fire. Now Jesus asks him three times, by another one.
“To the threefold denial there is now appended a threefold confession.”
The Greek word for that fire, , appears only twice in the New Testament: the night Peter denied him, and the morning of these questions.