English 
Chinese 
Dutch 
Arabic 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Russian 
French 
Italian 
German 
Japanese Not in itself. The Bible describes betrothals and wedding feasts but sets no ceremony, officiant or vows, so eloping breaks no command of Scripture. The churches differ. A Catholic must marry before a priest or deacon and two witnesses, an Orthodox Christian needs a church wedding, and the Church of England blesses couples already married in a civil ceremony.
What Scripture holds dear is the covenant itself, and it shows how many eyes are on it. When Boaz married Ruth, the elders and the people at the town gate answered, “We are witnesses.” Malachi names a greater witness still: “the Lord was witness between you and the wife of your youth.” However small the wedding, no couple marries out of his sight.
What does the Bible say about eloping?
The Bible never mentions eloping or secret weddings. The marriages it records follow the customs of their time, and none of them is presented as a rule. When Abraham’s servant came to take Rebekah to Isaac, her family asked her, “Will you go with this man?” and she said, “I will go” (Genesis 24:58). When she arrived, Genesis says only that “Isaac brought her into the tent of Sarah his mother and took Rebekah, and she became his wife” (Genesis 24:67). Laban “gathered together all the people of the place and made a feast” before Jacob’s wedding night (Genesis 29:22). Samson “prepared a feast there, for so the young men used to do” (Judges 14:10), and Jesus and his disciples were guests at a wedding in Cana (John 2:1–2). Boaz made his marriage to Ruth public at the town gate, where ten elders and the people gathered there answered, “We are witnesses” (Ruth 4:2, 9–11).
None of these passages describes a religious officiant or a set form of words, and the law of Moses prescribes no wedding ceremony. What Scripture treats as essential is the covenant itself. Genesis says that “a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24), and Malachi reminds the husbands of his day that “the Lord was witness between you and the wife of your youth” and calls her “your companion and your wife by covenant” (Malachi 2:14).
Is eloping a sin?
Scripture does not make it one, but the churches set their own requirements, and they differ.
For Catholics, the place and witnesses decide whether a marriage is valid at all. The Code of Canon Law says that “only those marriages are valid which are contracted before the local ordinary, pastor, or a priest or deacon delegated by either of them, who assist, and before two witnesses” (canon 1108). This form binds any marriage in which at least one party was baptized in the Catholic Church or received into it (canon 1117). A Catholic who elopes before a judge or a civil officiant, without a dispensation from the bishop, is not married in the eyes of the Church. The Catechism explains why the Church insists on a public form: marriage is “a state of life in the Church,” so “certainty about it is necessary (hence the obligation to have witnesses),” and “the public character of the consent protects the ‘I do’ once given and helps the spouses remain faithful to it” (1631). The law does allow for privacy. For “a grave and urgent cause,” a bishop can permit a marriage to be celebrated secretly (canon 1130).
The Orthodox Church requires a church wedding. The Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America states that the sacrament “must be celebrated by an Orthodox Priest of a canonical Orthodox jurisdiction, according to the liturgical tradition of the Orthodox Church, in a canonical Orthodox Church,” and that a baptized Orthodox Christian whose wedding has not been blessed by the Church “is no longer in good standing” and may not receive Holy Communion. The council of Orthodox bishops held in Crete in 2016, which the churches of Russia, Antioch, Bulgaria and Georgia did not attend, said that a civil marriage “lacks sacramental character.”
Protestant churches do not count marriage as a sacrament, yet they have wanted the church’s prayers over it. Martin Luther wrote in his marriage booklet of 1529 that “weddings and the married estate are worldly affairs,” but he also said pastors are obliged to bless, pray over or marry couples who ask. The Westminster Assembly’s Directory for Public Worship (1644) called marriage “no sacrament, nor peculiar to the church of God, but common to mankind,” yet judged it “expedient” that a minister solemnize it, so that he could counsel the couple and pray for them. The Church of England offers couples who married in a civil ceremony a Service of Prayer and Dedication, which it describes as “acknowledging the commitment already made between husband and wife.” In most Protestant teaching, then, a legal elopement is a real marriage, and the questions it raises concern family and church rather than validity.
Can Christians elope without their parents’ blessing?
The commandment “Honor your father and your mother” (Exodus 20:12) applies to adults as well as children, but Scripture also expects a married couple to form a new household: a man “shall leave his father and his mother” (Genesis 2:24). The Bible records marriages that grieved parents. Esau, at forty, married two Hittite women, “and they made life bitter for Isaac and Rebekah” (Genesis 26:34–35). Samson brushed aside his parents’ objection to a Philistine wife with “Get her for me, for she is right in my eyes” (Judges 14:3).
Catholic teaching separates obedience from respect. “Obedience toward parents ceases with the emancipation of the children; not so respect, which is always owed to them” (Catechism 2217). Adult children “have the right and duty to choose their profession and state of life,” and should do so “willingly asking and receiving” their parents’ advice, while parents “should be careful not to exert pressure on their children either in the choice of a profession or in that of a spouse” (Catechism 2230). For a minor, the rule is stricter: a priest may not assist at the marriage of a minor whose parents are unaware of it or reasonably opposed without the local bishop’s permission (canon 1071). The Westminster Directory asked for the parents’ consent to a first marriage, and added that “parents ought not to force their children to marry without their free consent, nor deny their own consent without just cause.”
Why did churches oppose secret marriages?
Early Christians expected the church to know of a marriage. Ignatius of Antioch, writing to Bishop Polycarp in the early second century, said that men and women who marry should “form their union with the approval of the bishop, that their marriage may be according to God, and not after their own lust.”
For centuries, though, a marriage made by the free consent of the couple, even in secret, was valid in the Western Church. The Council of Trent said so in its decree Tametsi of 11 November 1563, and also rejected the claim that marriages of children made without their parents’ consent were invalid. Yet it noted that the Church had “at all times detested and prohibited such marriages,” because a man could leave a wife he had married secretly and marry another in public. The council ruled that wherever its decree was published, a marriage made without the parish priest, or another priest with his permission, and two or three witnesses would be invalid. England took a similar step in 1753. Lord Hardwicke’s Marriage Act, which came into force on 25 March 1754, required a church wedding after banns or a license, and parental consent for anyone under 21 marrying by license. The act did not apply in Scotland, and English couples crossed the border to marry there, most famously at Gretna Green.
Is a small private wedding the same as eloping?
Not in the older sense of the word, which is a sudden, secret marriage, often made to avoid the parents’ disapproval. In recent years the word has also come to mean any small wedding, even one the family knows about. Scripture sets no minimum number of guests, and a Catholic wedding can be valid with only the priest or deacon and two witnesses present. What made an elopement a concern for the churches was secrecy from family and church, not the size of the party.
What if you have already eloped?
Each tradition has a way to regularize the marriage. A Catholic marriage that was invalid because the canonical form was not followed can be made valid by exchanging consent again before a priest or deacon and two witnesses (canon 1160), or by a “radical sanation,” in which the Church validates the marriage without a new exchange of consent, provided “it is probable that the parties wish to persevere in conjugal life” (canon 1161). Greek Orthodox parish guidance encourages an Orthodox Christian married outside the Church to meet the priest about having the marriage blessed. Anglican couples can use the Service of Prayer and Dedication after a civil marriage.
Where an elopement has hurt a family, Jesus’ words about the altar apply: “First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift” (Matthew 5:24). A marriage made quietly can still be brought into the open, before the family and the church, and before the Lord who was witness to it from the start.
Leave a Reply