Dutch 
English 
Chinese 
Arabic 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Russian 
French 
Italian 
German 
Japanese 
Continue reading with a subscription
Get unlimited access to all our premium content and exclusive features.
Enjoy unlimited access, cancel anytime.
Samenvatting
- De Bijbel ziet het huwelijk als een goddelijke verbintenis waarin echtparen alle aspecten van het leven delen, inclusief financiën, en moedigt wijs rentmeesterschap en vrijgevigheid aan.
- Huwelijkse voorwaarden kunnen in strijd zijn met christelijke opvattingen over de bestendigheid van het huwelijk, maar kunnen ook worden gezien als praktische hulpmiddelen voor financiële planning en het vermijden van conflicten.
- Huwelijkse voorwaarden kunnen vertrouwen en eenheid ondermijnen als ze egoïstisch worden benaderd, maar kunnen eerlijkheid en wederzijds respect bevorderen wanneer ze open en respectvol worden besproken.
- Christelijke leiders suggereren dat de geschiktheid van huwelijkse voorwaarden afhangt van de motivaties en de aansluiting bij bijbelse principes van rentmeesterschap, wederzijdse zorg en opofferende liefde.
Bibliografie (Klik om te tonen)
Atherstone, A. (2003). Archbishop Carey’s Ecumenical Vision. Theology, 106, 342–352.
Beck, R. (2014). The Integration of Theology and Psychology within the Church of Christ Tradition: Psychotherapy and Positive Psychology as Case Studies. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 33, 344.
Bednarowski, M. F. (1980). Outside the Mainstream: Women’s Religion and Women Religious Leaders in Nineteenth-Century America. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 207–232.
Blatt, W. S. (2005). Holy River and Magic Mountain: Public Lands Management and the Rediscovery of the Sacred in Nature. Law & Society Review, 39, 681–688.
Briley, R. (2017). Sacred Interests: The United States and the Islamic World, 1821–1921 Karine V. Walther. University of North Carolina Press, 2015. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40, 101–103.
Bryan, M. (2016). Valuing Tribal Sacred Water within Prior Appropriation.
Convenors, A. T., & Yang, Y. (2021). Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones. Decoding China’s Car Industry.
Diblasio, F. A., & Benda, B. (2008). Forgiveness Intervention with Married Couples: Two Empirical Analyses. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 27, 150.
Duba, J. (2009). The Basic Needs Genogram: A Tool to Help Inter-religious Couples Negotiate.
Gouldner, A. (1957). Theoretical Requirements of the Applied Social Sciences. American Sociological Review, 22, 92.
Harris, H., Yancey, G., Dawson, K. A., & Gregory, J. L. (2020). Congregational Discernment and LGBTQ+ Inclusion: Process Lessons from 21 Congregations. Religions.
Henry, J. F., Allegretti, J. G., Bush, R., & Cobb, S. (2001). Dialogue on the Practice of Law and Spiritual Values. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28, 991.
Hoover, D. R. (2004). Ecumenism of the Trenches? the Politics of Evangelical-Catholic Alliances. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 41, 247.
Jacobs, J. (2012). Assimilation for Muslims and Jews? Tikkun, 27, 52–54.
Joffe, L. F. (2019). Gender and Jewish Law. Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953), 13, 40–44.
Kaba, A. (2008). Culture, Economic Progress and Immigration: The Hispanic/Latino Population in the U.S. and the North African/Muslim Population in European Countries. 9.
Knight, R., & Knight, L. G. (2013). Tax Considerations When Dividing Property in Divorce: Marital Estate Division Offers Challenges and Opportunities for Advisers.
Lakatos, C. (2009). Confidence and Legitimization: The Role of the Protestant Church in Fostering Opposition in the GDR.
Monedero, P. (2019). Family Laws in the European Union. SocialinÄ— Teorija Empirija Politika Ir Praktika.
Muasya, R. M. (2018). The Challenge of Infertility to the Christian Marriage in Some African Societies¯: A Plea for an Ethical Response In The Light Of Donum Vitae.
Ngern, T. L. T. (2014). The Biblical Foundations of the Doctrine of Justification: An Ecumenical Follow-Up to the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 49, 362.
Peck, G. R. (1982). Black Radical Consciousness and the Black Christian Experience: Toward a Critical Sociology of Afro-American Religion. Sociology of Religion, 43, 155–169.
Perin, R. (2019). La cooperazione tra Chiesa cattolica, Chiesa anglicana e Chiese Libere in Inghilterra durante la seconda guerra mondiale. 29–44.
Randa, T. F. (2012). Developing pastors’ understanding and practice on biblical financial stewardship¯: the key to impacting the growth of the Bible Christian Fellowship Church of Indonesia.
Rowe, M. (1975). Pentecostal documents from the USSR. Religion in Communist Lands, 3, 16–18.
Sergeeva, A., Pryaluhina, A., Tuzova, O., & Tuchkova, T. (2019). SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS DEFINING THE ATTITUDE OF RUSSIAN PEOPLE TOWARDS PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT. SOCIETY INTEGRATION EDUCATION Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference.
Shanker, P. (2014). Book Review. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management & Extension Journal): A Worldwide Window on MSME Studies, 41, 93–98.
Tao, Y. (2019). Protest and Religion: Christianity in the People’s Republic of China. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Wallis, J. (1992). The Relevance for Social Economics of Alisdair Maclntyre’s Conception of a Practice. Review of Social Economy, 50, 2–23.
Weeks, L. B. (2019). Presbyterian Ecumenism. The Oxford Handbook of Presbyterianism.
Wilson, R. (2011). The Perils of Privatized Marriage. 253–283.
Ù©Ãâ„¢Âë ¬. (2013). ÕÅêµÂêµÂÚŒìÂËœ ÃÆ’ÅêµÂ선굠―ì—Â사, ʹ징과 ê³¼ì Å, ì„ êµÂ신ՙ젠ìŸÂì Â. 34, 471–508.
Anderson, P., Griego, O. V., & Stevens, R. (2010). Measuring High Level Motivation and Goal Attainment among Christian Undergraduate Students: An Empirical Assessment and Model. The Business Renaissance Quarterly, 5, 73.
Bailey, S., & Shaw, T. (2019). Communities of Disrespect: What Happens When Personhood is Lost. Episteme, 30, 5.
Barron, R. (2020). Pre-Nup Is Not A Dirty Word: Cohabitation Agreements, Prenuptial Agreements, Marital Property Agreements, Marital Property Agreements, and the Christian Family Law Attorney. Social Science Research Network.
Bryant, C. M., Wickrama, K., Bolland, J., Bryant, B. M., Cutrona, C., & Stanik, C. E. (2010). Race Matters, Even in Marriage: Identifying Factors Linked to Marital Outcomes for African Americans. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 157–174.
Campanaro, J. (2010). UNTIL DEATH DO US PART? WHY COURTS SHOULD EXPAND PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS TO INCLUDE TENYEAR MARRIAGES. Family Court Review, 48, 583–597.
Campbell, K. (2018). Newlywed Women and Marital Expectations 1 Newlywed Women ’ s Marital Expectations¯: Lifelong Monogamy¯?
Carter, E. (2012). Louisiana Prenuptial Agreements: Issues for Contemporary Spouses. LSN: Marriage (Topic).
Cott, N. (2001). Public Vows.
Crossin, J. (2010). The Ethical Horizon from an Ecumenical Point of View: Introduction. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 45, 352.
Crouse, J. S. (2012). Marriage Matters: Perspectives on the Private and Public Importance of Marriage.
Dalin, M. R., Yusoff, N. H., & Abdullah, A. (2023). THE CHALLENGES BISEXUAL HUSBANDS FACE IN TRYING TO KEEP THEIR MARRIAGE TOGETHER: A CASE STUDY IN MALAYSIA. E-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities.
Dasilva, W., & Agreements-The, P. (2016). from the Editor: Prenuptial Agreementsâ€â€The Balance Between Love and Money.
Divorce, & Salarpour, L. (2018). Mahr and Divorce: An Islamic Marriage Concept and Its Effects on Intrahousehold Bargaining Power of Couples.
Duba, J. (2009). The Basic Needs Genogram: A Tool to Help Inter-religious Couples Negotiate.
Fisher, H., & Low, H. (2012). Financial implications of relationship breakdown: Does marriage matter? Review of Economics of the Household, 13, 735–769.
Fisher, H., & Low, H. (2015). Financial implications of relationship breakdown: Does marriage matter? Review of Economics of the Household, 13, 735–769.
Gerson, K. (2023). Why No One Can Have It All and Why That Matters for Everyone1. Sociological Forum (Randolph, N.J.).
Hameed, D. A., & HAMID, H. A. H. (2023). Proposal for Updating Fatwa Issuing Mechanism in Financial Matters. Al Basirah.
Hook, J., Ripley, J., Worthington, E., & Davis, D. E. (2011). Christian Approaches for Helping Couples: Review of Empirical Research and Recommendations for Clinicians. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 30, 213.
Irawan, D., Mustikasiwi, A., Djap, W., Hermawati, O., & Santosa, E. (2021). Pastors and Treasurers: A Case Study of Financial Management in Christian Organization. Integritas: Jurnal Teologi.
Ivanova, E., Perepelkina, N. V., & Semenova, N. (2022). PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT AS A CIVIL TRANSACTION. Oeconomia et Jus.
Joffe, L. F. (2019). Gender and Jewish Law. Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953), 13, 40–44.
Judith, O. (2015). PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS: THE SOLUTION TO CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES TO MATRIMONY IN KENYA? 5.
Köstenberger, B. A. J. (2011). THE BIBLE’S TEACHING ON MARRIAGE AND FAMILY.
Lersch, P. (2017). Individual Wealth and Subjective Financial Well-Being in Marriage: Resource Integration or Separation? Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 1211–1223.
Linh, N. T. M. (2021). Marital Agreements in Vietnam from 1858 until Now. DÃÂKÉ.
Mackay, A. (2012). Who Gets a Better Deal? Women and Prenuptial Agreements in Australia and the USA.
Malik, A. (2024). The Necessity of a Standard Prenuptial Agreement for American Muslims. Journal of Islamic Faith and Practice.
Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John. (2011). Christian Witness in a Multi-Religious World: Recommendations for Conduct. International Bulletin of Mission Research, 35, 194–196.
Mendoza, D. S., & Krone, S. P. (1997). An Interview with Judy G. Barber: Prenuptial Agreements, Intimacy, Trust and Control. Family Business Review, 10, 173–178.
Oates, W. (1966). Book Review: III. Practical Studies: Marriage and the Bible. Review & Expositor, 63, 229–229.
Radzyner, A. (2018). JEWISH LAW, STATE, AND SOCIAL REALITY: PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS FOR THE PREVENTION OF DIVORCE REFUSAL IN ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES. The Journal of Law and Religion, 33, 61–88.
Rajamanickam, R., Kung, K. B., Shariff, A., Said, M., & Dahlan, N. (2019). Prenuptial Agreement: Legal Position in Malaysia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies.
RatnikaitÄ—, I. (2014). Educational Principles of the Family as Domestic Church.
Rosenkrantz, J. (2016). Prenuptial Agreements for the Golden Years.
Ross, D., O’Neal, C., Arnold, A., & Mancini, J. A. (2017). Money Matters in Marriage: Financial Concerns, Warmth, and Hostility Among Military Couples. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 38, 572–581.
Royani, E., Nortjahjo, A., Sobirov, B., & Triana, A. (2024). JURIDICAL REVIEW OF PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS. Awang Long Law Review.
Schaubert, M. (2023). Do Alimony Regulations Matter Inside Marriage? Evidence from the 2008 Reform of the German Maintenance Law. Journal of Labor Research, 1–34.
Singh, M. C. (2004). Book Review: In Search of Identity: Debates on Religious Conversion in India, Identity, Hegemony, Resistance: Towards a Social History of Conversions (1800–2000). International Bulletin of Mission Research, 28, 39–40.
Tiwari, R. (2018). Prenuptial Agreements in India. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 4, 362–365.
Towards a trinitarian understanding of marriage¯: how might the unity of persons in communion help rediscover the principles of Christian marriage¯? (2020).
Zaloudek, J. A. (2005). A Phenomenological Exploration of How One Partner’s Religious Change Impacts Their Couple Relationship.
Zicklin, G. (2023). The Rainbow after the Storm: Marriage Equality and Social Change in the U.S. Contemporary Sociology, 52, 278–282.
ìµÅ진ì˜Â. (2014). The Financial Stewardship Bible (Contemporary English Version) (New York: American Bible Society, 2011). 371–384.
