English 
Chinese 
Dutch 
Arabic 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Russian 
French 
Italian 
German 
Japanese 
Continue reading with a subscription
Get unlimited access to all our premium content and exclusive features.
Enjoy unlimited access, cancel anytime.
Summary
- The Seamless Robe's Origin and Location are Uncertain: While tradition suggests Mary or a skilled artisan might have made Jesus' seamless robe, its origin is unknown. Similarly, the robe's current location is debated, with various relics claiming to be the true garment, most notably the Holy Robe of Trier.
- The Robe's Significance Transcends its Physical Existence: Whether or not a relic is authentic, the seamless robe's importance lies in its symbolism. It represents the unity of Christ's Church, the wholeness of his sacrifice, and the integrity of his divine and human nature.
- Church Fathers Emphasized Unity and Wholeness: Early Church leaders interpreted the seamless robe as a powerful image of the Church's indivisibility, urging Christians to maintain unity amidst differences. They also saw it as a symbol of Christ's unified divine and human nature.
- The Robe Holds Prophetic and Psychological Meaning: Fulfilling Psalm 22:18, the robe's undivided state during the crucifixion points to God's plan. Psychologically, it represents wholeness and integration, challenging individuals and the Church to live out faith with consistency and work towards greater unity.
Bibliography (Click to show)
Crook, Z. (2013). Book Review: Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus. Biblical Theology Bulletin, 43, 231–239.
Hartin, P. (2010). The Pharisaic roots of Jesus and the early church.
Lach, R. (2015). Gesprächsspiele & Ideenmagazin. Heinrich von Kleist und die Briefkultur um 1800. Herausgegeben von Ingo Breuer, Katarzyna Jastal und Pawel Zarychta. Köln: Böhlau, 2013. 396 Seiten + zahlreiche s/w Abbildungen. € 59,90. Monatshefte, 107, 320–323.
Linford, M. (2016). The Parable of the Benevolent Father and Son. Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture, 22.
Lublink, P. R. (2020). JOHN CALVIN’S TREATISE ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN.
Marshall, M. T. (1994). Book Review: III. Historical-Theological: The Christology of Jesus. Review & Expositor, 91, 116–117.
Spinks, B. (2017). Material Eucharist. The Expository Times, 129, 32–33.
Zhi-ping, W. (2011). On the Two Times of Matteo Ricci’s Changing Clothes and Its Cultural Significance. Journal of Anqing Teachers College.
Coverman, S. (1987). Book Reviews. Gender & Society, 1, 476–481.
Fauziah, I., & Nursari, F. (2020). Penerapan Zero Waste Fashion Design Dengan Adaptasi Bentuk Geometris Pada Kain Tenun Lurik Untuk Modest Wear. 7.
Garber, Z. (2002). Constantine’s Sword: The Church and the Jews (review). Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies, 20, 108–110.
Gengrinovich, A. I. (1941). Book Reviews. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, 136, 146–150.
Juniati, N. (2022). The Function and Meaning of Tope’ le’leng in the Death Ritual of The Kajang Tribe, South Sulawesi. Jurnal Kawistara.
Peña, D. B. (2018). The Use of Clothes as Compositional and SymbolicElements in the Work The Coronation of theVirgin by Diego Velázquez. 4, 1–4.
Purwaning, G. P. (2020). Perancangan Produk Ready To Wear Bagi Pria Untuk Menunjang Kegiatan Heritage Walk. 7.
Rohim, M. Z. M., Aribyan, A. N., Tanti, S. M. Y., Tsaniya, H. W., Chofifah, U. N., & Nurpratiwi, H. (2023). Nilai Sosial dan Budaya Tradisi Tedhak Siten Masyarakat Desa Kalangan, Ngunut, Tulungagung. Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya.
Sungkar, S. A. M., & Febriani, R. (2019). Application of Pringgasela Weaving on Ready-to-Wear Clothing and Business Opportunities in the Fashion Industry. 88–91.
Vearncombe, E. K. (2014). What Would Jesus Wear? Dress in the Synoptic Gospels.
Yan, H., Zhang, H., Shi, J., Ma, J., & Xu, X. (2023). Inspiration Transfer for Intelligent Design: A Generative Adversarial Network With Fashion Attributes Disentanglement. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 69, 1152–1163.
Bacon, B. (1899). Exegetical Notes. The Biblical World, 13, 423–425.
Dobie, R. J. (2010). Book Review: The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy: From Antiquity through the Seventeenth Century. Theological Studies, 71, 214–216.
Fleeger, J. (2011). The Religious Film: Christianity and the Hagiopic (review). Journal of Film and Video, 63, 64–66.
Gianfaldoni, S., Lotti, J., Roccia, M., Fioranelli, M., Gianfaldoni, R., & Lotti, T. (2017). Stigmata in the history: between faith, mysticism and science. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, 31 2 Suppl. 2, 45–52.
Lach, R. (2015). Gesprächsspiele & Ideenmagazin. Heinrich von Kleist und die Briefkultur um 1800. Herausgegeben von Ingo Breuer, Katarzyna Jastal und Pawel Zarychta. Köln: Böhlau, 2013. 396 Seiten + zahlreiche s/w Abbildungen. € 59,90. Monatshefte, 107, 320–323.
Lublink, P. R. (2020). JOHN CALVIN’S TREATISE ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN.
Puig, M., Masnou, H., Mesonero, F., Menchén, L., Bujanda, L., Castro, J., González-Partida, I., Vicente, R., González-Muñoza, C., Iborra, M., Sierra, M., Huguet, J., GarcÃÂa, M. J., Francisco, R., GarcÃÂa-Alonso, F., Mañosa, M., Domènech, E., & Registry, O. B. O. E.-G. (2023). Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Observational Study from the ENEIDA Registry and Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12.
Senkewicz, R. M., Serra, J., Fornerod, S., & Gundlach, T. (2016). Books Received. Theological Studies, 77, 550–556.
Stacey, R. C. (1998). From ritual crucifixion to host desecration: Jews and the body of Christ. Jewish History, 12, 11–28.
Stevens, G., & Robertson, J. (1900). Articles upon the Life of Christ, III. The Biblical World, 15, 376–378.
Sturges, R. (2015). Things: Objects and Agency in the Trial and Crucifixion Plays. 33–50.
Vera, V. J., & ÃÂvila, C. S. (2017). Four Versions of the Christus by the Massys: Deciphering the Meaning of the Letters. Religion, 8, 19.
