Portuguese 
English 
Chinese 
Dutch 
Arabic 
Spanish 
Russian 
French 
Italian 
German 
Japanese 
Continue reading with a subscription
Get unlimited access to all our premium content and exclusive features.
Enjoy unlimited access, cancel anytime.
Resumo
- A visão dos Amish sobre bicicletas varia de acordo com a comunidade e é regida pelo seu Ordnung, refletindo o seu compromisso com a simplicidade e a comunidade.
- Em algumas comunidades, as bicicletas são permitidas como transporte prático, mas regulamentadas para manter a humildade e evitar distrações mundanas.
- As preocupações com as bicicletas incluem a promoção do individualismo, o aumento da interação com o mundo exterior e o fomento ao orgulho ou materialismo.
- Os métodos de transporte alternativos para os Amish incluem charretes puxadas por cavalos, caminhar e depender de vizinhos, enfatizando o apoio comunitário.
Bibliografia (Clique para mostrar)
Bibliografia:
Ahmed, T., Pirdavani, A., Wets, G., & Janssens, D. (2024). Assessing Heterogeneity Among Cyclists Towards Importance of Bicycle Infrastructural Elements in Urban Areas. Infrastructures.
Aljoufie, M. (2017). Examining the Challenges of Bicycle Use in Jeddah City. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 269–281.
Amoh-Gyimah, R., Sarvi, M., & Saberi, M. (2016). Investigating the Effects of Traffic, Socioeconomic, and Land Use Characteristics on Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes: A Case Study of Melbourne, Australia.
Anderson, C. (2022). Ten Years of the Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies: An Editor’s Reflections on a Social Movement in Academia. Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies.
Anderson, C., & Bacon, R. (2024). Profiles of Major Amish Settlements in North America: A Guide for Researchers and Service Providers. Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies, 12 1, 47–79.
Ao, Y., & Martek, I. (2020). The Impact of the Built Environment on Bicycle Use Behavior of Rural Residents. 263–288.
Avila-Palencia, I., Sarmiento, O., Gouveia, N., Jáuregui, A., Mascolli, M. A., Slovic, A., & RodrÃÂguez, D. A. (2023). Bicycle use in Latin American cities: changes over time by socio-economic position. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5.
Balcı, V., Ãâ€zbek, O., Koçak, F., & Çeyiz, S. (2018). Determination of the constraints of bicycle use ın urban life Kent yaÅŸamında bisiklet kullanım engellerinin belirlenmesi. Journal of New Results in Science, 15, 35–50.
Bamberg, S. (2012). Chapter 9 Understanding and Promoting Bicycle Use – Insights from Psychological Research. 1.
Bandeira, A. S., Silva, K., Duca, G. F. D., Zilch, G. R., Oliveira, E. S., Barros, M. V., & Nahas, M. V. (2017). Factors associated with bicycle use for commuting and for leisure among Brazilian workers. Sport Sciences for Health, 13, 63–68.
Barajas, J. M., Chatman, D., & Agrawal, A. W. (2016). Exploring bicycle and public transit use by low-income Latino immigrants¯: a mixed-methods study in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Biassoni, F., Carmine, C. L., Perego, P., & Gnerre, M. (2023). Choosing the Bicycle as a Mode of Transportation, the Influence of Infrastructure Perception, Travel Satisfaction and Pro-Environmental Attitude, the Case of Milan. Sustainability.
Brown, C., & Sinclair, J. (2017). Removing Barriers to Bicycle Use in Black and Hispanic Communities.
Camargo, É., Fermino, R., Añez, C., & Reis, R. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to bicycle use for transport and leisure among adults. 19, 256–256.
Camargo, É., Fermino, R., & Reis, R. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative aspects of barriers to bicycle use for adults from Curitiba, Brazil.
Chen, L.-H., & Chancellor, H. (2020). Examining the leisure use of a bicycle share program: A case study of YouBike in Taipei. Journal of Leisure Research, 51, 183–205.
Dann, R. (2015). Factors Associated with the Bicycle Commute Use of Newcomers: An Analysis of the 70 Largest U.S. Cities.
Ems, L. (2015). Exploring ethnographic techniques for ICT non-use research: An Amish case study. First Monday, 20.
Fedewa, A. L., Cornelius, C., & Ahn, S. (2015). The use of bicycle workstations to increase physical activity in secondary classrooms. Health Psychology Report, 6, 60–74.
Feng, P., & Wen-Li. (2016). Willingness to Use a Public Bicycle System: An Example in Nanjing City. The Journal of Public Transportation, 19, 6.
Fernández-Heredia, ÃÂ. (2013). Understanding and modeling bicycle use¯: the role of perceptions.
Fernández-Heredia, ÃÂ., Jara-DÃÂaz, S., & Monzón, A. (2016). Modelling bicycle use intention: the role of perceptions. Transportation, 43, 1–23.
Figueroa, M., Navrátil, J., Turrini, A., & Krlev, G. (2019). Social Innovation in Environmental Sustainability: Promoting Sharing Public Spaces for Bicycle Use. 149–172.
Fyhri, A., Heinen, E., Fearnley, N., & Sundfør, H. B. (2017). A push to cyclingâ€â€exploring the e-bike’s role in overcoming barriers to bicycle use with a survey and an intervention study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11, 681–695.
González, R. M., Román, C., & Marrero, ÃÂ. S. (2018). Visitors’ Attitudes towards Bicycle Use in the Teide National Park. Sustainability.
Havet, N., & Bouzouina, L. (2024). Bicycle use in the university community: Empirical analysis using MobiCampus-UdL data (Lyon, France). Journal of Transport and Land Use.
Jahanshahi, D., Tabibi, Z., & Wee, B. (2020). Factors influencing the acceptance and use of a bicycle sharing system: Applying an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Case Studies on Transport Policy.
Jelijs, B., Heutink, J., Waard, D., Brookhuis, K., & Melis-Dankers, B. (2018). Key factors for the bicycle use of visually impaired people: a Delphi study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41, 2758–2765.
Kaplan, S., Wrzesinska, D. K., & Prato, C. G. (2018). The role of human needs in the intention to use conventional and electric bicycle sharing in a driving-oriented country. Transport Policy.
Kaplan, S., Wrzesinska, D. K., & Prato, C. G. (2019). Psychosocial benefits and positive mood related to habitual bicycle use. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
Karl, F. M., Smith, J., Piedt, S., Turcotte, K., & Pike, I. (2017). Applying the health action process approach to bicycle helmet use and evaluating a social marketing campaign. Injury Prevention, 24, 288–295.
Konietzka, D., & Neugebauer, L. (2023). Less car, more bicycle? Generation Y as pioneers of changing everyday mobility in Germany. European Transport Research Review, 15.
Kraemer, J. (2016). Bicycle helmet laws and persistent racial and ethnic helmet use disparities among urban high school students: a repeated cross-sectional analysis. Injury Epidemiology, 3.
Kuhns, J. Y., & Yoder, D. L. (2022). Symposium Review: Amish and Old Order Mennonite Schools: A Concise Historyâ€â€Joseph Stoll; and The School by the Cornfieldâ€â€Samuel Coon. Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies.
Liao, Y. (2016). Association of Sociodemographic and Perceived Environmental Factors with Public Bicycle Use among Taiwanese Urban Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13.
Ma, S., Zhou, Y., Yu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019). College Students’ Shared Bicycle Use Behavior Based on the NL Model and Factor Analysis. Sustainability.
Maas, S., Attard, M., & Caruana, M. (2020). Assessing spatial and social dimensions of shared bicycle use in a Southern European island context: The case of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice, 140, 81–97.
Mateo-Babiano, I., Bean, R., Corcoran, J., & Pojani, D. (2016). How does our natural and built environment affect the use of bicycle sharing. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice, 94, 295–307.
Medeiros, R., & Duarte, F. (2013). Policy to promote bicycle use or bicycle to promote politicians? Bicycles in the imagery of urban mobility in Brazil. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 1, 28–39.
Molinillo, S., Ruiz-Montañez, M., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2020). User characteristics influencing use of a bicycle-sharing system integrated into an intermodal transport network in Spain. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14, 513–524.
Nkurunziza, A., & Maarseveen, M. (2013). A retrospective study of behavioural transitions in bicycle use of commuters in Dar-es-Salaam. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 130, 597–608.
Parker, C. (2019). Bicycle use and accessibility among people experiencing homelessness in California cities. Journal of Transport Geography.
Parker, J., Schlegel, P. J., Doohan, D., & Lejeune, J. (2016). Understanding Perceptions of Fresh Produce Safety and Barriers to Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) Use Among Amish Growers in the Holmes County Settlement of Ohio. The Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 6, 37–59.
Paschalidis, E., Oikonomou, A., Konstantinidou, M. N., Basbas, S., & Politis, I. (2022). The relationship of bicycle use and aggressive driving behaviour: a latent variable model approach. Transportation Letters, 15, 1140–1153.
Piotrowski, C., Warda, L., Pankratz, C. J., Dubberley, K., Russell, K., Assam, H., & Carevic, M. (2020a). A comparison of parent and child perspectives about barriers to and facilitators of bicycle helmet and booster seat use. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 27, 276–285.
Piotrowski, C., Warda, L., Pankratz, C. J., Dubberley, K., Russell, K., Assam, H., & Carevic, M. (2020b). The perspectives of young people on barriers to and facilitators of bicycle helmet and booster seat use. Child: Care, Health and Development.
PogaÄÂar, K., Dežan, L., Lamot, M., & RenÄÂelj, M. (2020). Determinants of Bicycle Use among Student Population: Exploratory Research of Social and Infrastructure Factors. Applied System Innovation.
Prati, G., Angelis, M., Fraboni, F., Pietrantoni, L., Johnson, D., & Shires, J. (2020). Journey Attributes, E-Bike Use, and Perception of Driving Behavior of Motorists as Predictors of Bicycle Crash Involvement and Severity. Transportation Research Record, 2674, 581–589.
Raber, D. (2022). Review of: Our Amish Heritageâ€â€Publishing Committee of the Geauga Amish Historical Library. Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies.
Rosenberg, E., & Petre, S. (2024). Symposium Review: Strictly Observant: Amish and Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Women Negotiating Media 2nd ed(#). Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies.
Sanchez, S. H., Thanik, E., Bey, G. S., Papazaharias, D. M., Onyebeke, L. C., Oh, J., Syldort, M., Wolf, S., & Garland, E. J. (2018). Assessment of Bicycle Use Among Residents in Affordable Housing in New York City. Science Journal of Public Health, 6, 127.
Shahar, R. N.-B. (2019). Mobile internet is worse than the internet; it can destroy our community: Old Order Amish and Ultra-Orthodox Jewish women’s responses to cellphone and smartphone use. The Information Society, 36, 1–18.
Sharma, B., Nam, H.-K., Yan, W., & Kim, H. Y. (2019). Barriers and Enabling Factors Affecting Satisfaction and Safety Perception with Use of Bicycle Roads in Seoul, South Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16.
Stein, R. E., Corcoran, K. E., Colyer, C., & DiGregorio, B. D. (2022). Echo Chambers in a Closed Community: Vaccine Uptake and Perceived Effectiveness among the Amish and Old Order Mennonites. The Sociological Quarterly, 64, 165–186.
Streit, T., Weiss, C., Chlond, B., & Vortisch, P. (2014). More Cycling or More Cyclists – Dynamics and Potentials of Bicycle Use in Germany by a Cluster-Based Approach.
Thomas, A. (2016). A More Sustainable Minivan? An Exploratory Study of Electric Bicycle Use by San Francisco Bay Area Families.
Troyer, H. (2022). Twinning Characteristics of the Amish Groups of Holmes County, Ohio. The Journal of Plain Anabaptist Communities.
Valero-Mora, P. M., Shinar, D., Ledesma, R., & Haworth, N. (2018). Why women do not use the helmet when riding a bicycle. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62, 1594–1598.
Watthanaklang, D., & Ratanavaraha, V. (2019). The Development of Guidelines on Promoting Bicycle Use for Tourism in Khao Yai National Park. 20, 492–498.
Zanotto, M., & Winters, M. (2017). Helmet Use Among Personal Bicycle Riders and Bike Share Users in Vancouver, BC. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53 4, 465–472.
