Japanese 
English 
Chinese 
Dutch 
Arabic 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Russian 
French 
Italian 
German 
Continue reading with a subscription
Get unlimited access to all our premium content and exclusive features.
Enjoy unlimited access, cancel anytime.
概要
- 数字の414は聖書の中で明示的に言及されておらず、聖書数秘術においても特に認められた象徴的な意味は持っていません。
- ヨハネ4章14節やネヘミヤ記4章14節のような箇所を探求することは霊的な洞察を与えてくれるかもしれませんが、聖書によって明確に裏付けられていない数字のパターンを過度に強調すべきではありません。
- 4や1といった数字、およびそれらの組み合わせは、創造、統一、完全性を象徴することがあり、聖書の中心的な教えを損なうことなく、考察のためのテーマを提供してくれます。
- クリスチャンは、414のような数字に隠された意味を求めるのではなく、愛、贖い、信仰という明確な聖書のメッセージに焦点を当てるよう奨励されています。
参考文献（クリックして表示）
参考文献：
Bauer, U. F. W. (2000). Warum Nur Ubertretet Ihr SEIN Geheiss! eine Synchrone Exegese der Anti-Erzahlung Von Richter 17-18. Journal of Biblical Literature, 119, 550.
Book Review: The Pericope Adulterae, the Gospel of John, and the Literacy of Jesus. By Chris Keith. New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents 38. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009. Pp. xvi + 320. Cloth, $169.00. (n.d.).
Books Received. (1965). The Journal of Religion, 45, 358–360.
Books Received. (1981). Interpretation, 35, 110–112.
Dillon, A. (2021). Bible Journaling as a Spiritual Aid in Addiction Recovery. Religions.
Kroesch, S. (1929). The Semantic Development of OE Cræft. Modern Philology, 26, 433–443.
Lee, I.-S. (2022). Considering the Meaning of Spiritual Worship through the Translation of the Korean Bible – Reflections on Logikhen Latreian(λογικην λαÄÃÂειαν) as a Service to Life -. Theology and Praxis.
Midgley, L. C. (1989). Prophetic Messages or Dogmatic Theology? Commenting on the Book of Mormon: A Review Essay. Review of Books on the Book of Mormon.
NAHUM/HABAKKUK/ZEPHANIAH/HAGGAI/ZECHARIAH/MALACHI: A COMMENTARY IN THE WESLEYAN TRADITION. By Laurie J.Braaten and JimEdlin. New Beacon Bible Commentary. Kansas City, MO.: Beacon Hill, 2019. Pp. 414. $35.99. (n.d.).
Schaarschmidt, G., Yoshie, M., Orr, R. A., Marta, D., Rolland, P. A., Pavlunik, S., Bidoshi, K., Woodsworth, J. A., Waisberg, P., Kaehne, A., Kenworthy, S., Cassiday, J. A., Wilson, G. N., Dyker, D., Lohr, E., Wanner, C., Comtet, R., Leafgren, J. R., Gaut, G., ¦ Ã…Â ipka, D. (2005). Book Reviews. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 47, 423–484.
Tov, A. (2024). The Meaning of Using the Name of a Figure in the Bible According to the Interpretation in the Jewish Religious Literature. Open Journal for Studies in Arts.
Westwood, S. (1987). Book Reviews. Work Employment & Society, 1, 144–145.
Williamson, W., & Silver, C. F. (2021). In the Face of Adversity: A Phenomenological Study of Spiritual Struggles among Bible-Believing Christians. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 31, 189–204.
Bauer, U. F. W. (2000). Warum Nur Ubertretet Ihr SEIN Geheiss! eine Synchrone Exegese der Anti-Erzahlung Von Richter 17-18. Journal of Biblical Literature, 119, 550.
Collins, J. (1974). Book Review: Wereldbeeld En Teologie Van De Middeleeuwen Tot Vandaag. Theological Studies, 35, 536–537.
Degórski, B. (2023). Uwagi dotyczące miejsc kultu w okresie starożytności chrześcijańskiej. Studia Teologii Dogmatycznej.
GerardHall, S., Bevans, S., Schroeder, R., & Panikkar, R. (2011). Prophetic Dialogue as a Practical Theological Category.
Hall, G. (2011). Prophetic Dialogue as a Practical Theological Category 1.
Horton, G. R. (2022). Otherwise than Empire: Psychotherapeutic Implications of Brueggemann’s Prophetic Imagination. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 50, 27–37.
Jamrozi, A. S. S., Fikriawan, S., Anwar, S., & Ardiansyah, M. (2022). MaqÄÂá¹£id al-SharÄ«a in The Study of Hadith and Its Implication for The Renewal of Islamic Law: Study on Jasser Auda’s Thought. Justicia Islamica.
マラニャク, A. (2023). 使徒教父の解釈におけるキリスト教会の統一. Sophia. 人間と宗教の研究紀要.
Menewe, B. C. (2023). Prophetic oracles regarding the Day of the Lord in Zechariah 14:1-9 and their implications for the Church today. Pharos Journal of Theology.
Schnittjer, G. E. (2018). KADESH INFIDELITY OF DEUTERONOMY 1 AND ITS SYNOPTIC IMPLICATIONS.
テレンチェフ, T. (2023). モンゴルにおけるロシア正教会の宣教活動 (1990年代後半〜2020年代初頭). Respublica Literaria.
Vázquez, S. H., & Gargiulo, M. (2023). Evagrius Ponticus’ Rejection of a Magical Understanding of Grace. Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia.
Williams, D. (2014). The Gospel of Matthew in Service of the Early Fathers. Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology, 23, 81–98.
Willsher, B. (1993). Adam and Eve scenes on kirkyard monuments in the Scottish Lowlands. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.
Abrahamsen, V. (2014). Scripture and the Authority of God: How to Read the Bible Today. Anglican and Episcopal History, 83, 88.
Adams, W., Adams, M., & Passages, B. (2016). LANGUAGE DRIFT AND THE DATING OF BIBLICAL PASSAGES.
Book Review: The Pericope Adulterae, the Gospel of John, and the Literacy of Jesus. By Chris Keith. New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents 38. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009. Pp. xvi + 320. Cloth, $169.00. (n.d.).
Books Received. (1965). The Journal of Religion, 45, 358–360.
Books Received. (1981). Interpretation, 35, 110–112.
Farrelly, J. (1977). Book Review: La Notion Biblique de Dieu: Le Dieu de la Bible et le Dieu des Philosophes. Theological Studies, 38, 365–367.
Haak, R. (1992). Index of Biblical Passages. 167–172.
Howard, E. (2023). Devotion in and to Biblical Languages. Expository Times, 134, 237–237.
Index of Books. (1988). Scottish Journal of Theology, 41, 585–587.
Kitsos, M. (2024). Jews and their Biblical Kin in Conflict: Fabricating Internal Dissent in Medieval Anti-Jewish Dialogues. Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations.
NAHUM/HABAKKUK/ZEPHANIAH/HAGGAI/ZECHARIAH/MALACHI: A COMMENTARY IN THE WESLEYAN TRADITION. By Laurie J.Braaten and JimEdlin. New Beacon Bible Commentary. Kansas City, MO.: Beacon Hill, 2019. Pp. 414. $35.99. (n.d.).
Ndoga, S. (2021). Biblical pragmatism in the pandemic outbreak of Numbers 25:1–18: Towards an African paradigm. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies.
Suchard, B. (2020). The Origins of the Biblical Aramaic Reading Tradition. Vetus Testamentum (Print).
Walker, G. (2000). Secular Eschatology: Beliefs about Afterlife. OMEGA  Journal of Death and Dying, 41, 22–25.
Watson, C. N. (2024). A FEMININE TYPOLOGICAL TRINITY IN PROBA’S CENTO VERGILIANVS 380–414. Classical Quarterly.
