English 
Chinese 
Dutch 
Arabic 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Russian 
French 
Italian 
German 
Japanese 
Continue reading with a subscription
Get unlimited access to all our premium content and exclusive features.
Enjoy unlimited access, cancel anytime.
Summary
- The biblical genealogy from Noah to Jesus traces through Shem, Abraham, David, and ultimately to Christ, demonstrating God’s faithfulness across generations and fulfilling Old Testament prophecies. This lineage includes both righteous and flawed individuals, highlighting God’s grace.
- There are differences between the genealogies in Matthew and Luke, which may reflect different purposes (Matthew emphasizing Jesus’ royal lineage, Luke His connection to all humanity) or potentially represent legal versus biological lineages. These differences have been a subject of scholarly discussion for centuries.
- The genealogy includes several women (Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba, and Mary), which is significant given the patriarchal norms of the time. Their inclusion demonstrates God’s inclusive love and the important role of women in salvation history.
Bibliography (Click to show)
—
Bibliography:
Alexander, T. (1993). Genealogies, Seed and the Compositional Unity of Genesis. Tyndale Bulletin.
Babkina, S. (2023). HISTORY AND MYTHOLOGY IN THE GOSPEL STORY ABOUT THE EXECUTION OF JOHN THE BAPTIST. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion.
Blumenthal, F. (2013). From Noah to Abraham: The Onomastics of the Period. Jewish Bible Quarterly, 41, 250.
Corresponding the Pinnacle and Depth of Man in the Quran and Masnavi and its Reflection in Safavid Paintings. (2021).
Delalay, M.-A. (2009). The covenant ritual in Genesis 15¯: examining the nature of the covenant in light of its cultural and literary context.
Dell, K. (2020). Joseph Blenkinsopp, The Beauty of Holiness: Re-Reading Isaiah in Light of the Psalms (London: T&T Clark/Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. xii + 174. £55.00. Scottish Journal of Theology, 73, 186–188.
Eloff, M. (2004). Exile, restoration and Matthew’s genealogy of Jesus ’O ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ. 38, 75–87.
Epp, J. E. (2019). Blessing and Curse.
Glover, D. (2022). For That Is What His Name Means (Acts 13:8): Luke’s Etymology of Elymas the Magician. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 84, 609–626.
Grover, R. A. (2019). Full Issue. Avian Diseases, 63, 1–149.
Guignard, C. (2016). Les traditions généalogiques de la famille de Jésus et les généalogies évangéliques. 4, 165–216.
Hummon, D. (2008). Climbing Jacob’s Ladder: Reconstructing the Ladder in African American Spirituals. The Journal of American Culture, 31, 164–174.
Kaminski, C. M. (2005). From Noah to Israel: Realization of the Primaeval Blessing After the Flood.
Madsen, J. (2020). Covenant Peoples, Covenant Journeys: Archetypal Similarities between the Noah, Abraham, and Moses Narratives. 19, 1–17.
Moon, C. (2017). Blood, Blood Everywhere and Not A Drop To Drink: How Jesus’ Blood Fulfills the Law. Lumen et Vita.
Shenk, C. E. (1994). Book Review: Faith without Prejudice: Rebuilding Christian Attitudes toward Judaism. Missiology: An International Review, 22, 244–245.
Sinaga, J., Sinambela, J., Tamba, G., & Pane, E. (2022). THE JESUS GENEALOGY CONTROVERSY REVEALS THE SECRET OF THE SALVATION PLAN. QUAERENS Journal of Theology and Christianity Studies.
Smit, P. (2010). Something about Mary? Remarks about the Five Women in the Matthean Genealogy. New Testament Studies, 56, 191–207.
Soyer, F. (2016). All one in Christ Jesus? Spiritual closeness, genealogical determinism and the conversion of Jews in Alonso de Espina’s Fortalitium Fidei. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 17, 239–254.
Thompsett, F. H. (2004). Baptismal living: Steadfast covenant of hope. Anglican Theological Review, 86, 9–18.
Tolan, J. (2018). The Quranic Noah and the Making of the Islamic Prophet: A Study of Intertextuality and Religious Identity Formation in Late Antiquity. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 29, 530–532.
Wert, L. (2004). From Abraham to Jacob: Promise and Fulfillment. Verbum, 2, 34–47.
Wilson, M. W. (2015). Noah, the ark, and the flood in early Christian literature. Scriptura¯: International Journal of Bible, Religion and Theology in Southern Africa, 113, 1–12.
Withers, B. C. (1999). Unfulfilled promise: the rubrics of the Old English prose Genesis. Anglo-Saxon England, 28, 111–139.
Archer, J. (2021). Ancient Bioi and Luke’s Modifications of Matthew’s Longer Discourses. New Testament Studies, 68, 76–88.
Grover, R. A. (2019). Full Issue. Avian Diseases, 63, 1–149.
Ibrahim, R. (2019). Cathedrals and churches of the pilgrimage routes for Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela Assist.
Madsen, J. (2020). Covenant Peoples, Covenant Journeys: Archetypal Similarities between the Noah, Abraham, and Moses Narratives. 19, 1–17.
Ray, P., Norris, & Hamacher, D. (2011). Aboriginal-Rock art-Archaeoastronomy-Ethnoastronomy-Australia ASTRONOMICAL SYMBOLISM IN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL ROCK ART.
Reynolds, E. (2013). The Development of Stained Glass in Gothic Cathedrals. 4, 3.
Rippin, A. (2000). The Near and Middle East. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 63, 288–289.
Sanders, H. (1913). The Genealogies of Jesus. Journal of Biblical Literature, 32, 184.
Sivertsen, B. (2005). New Testament Genealogies and the Families of Mary and Joseph. Biblical Theology Bulletin, 35, 43–50.
Strømmen, H. (2014). The ends of (hu)man¯: following Jacques Derrida’s animal question into the biblical archive.
Tworek, M. (2010). The University of Mantua, the Gonzaga and the Jesuits, 1584–1630 . By Paul F. Grendler. Pp. xiii+287 incl. 4 maps, 2 genealogical charts and 13 figs. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009. £31. 978 0 8018 9171 7. The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 61, 859–859.
Whitaker, C. J. (2015). Black Legacies: Race and the European Middle Ages by Lynn T. Ramey (review). College Literature, 42, 355–358.
Willmington, H. L. (2017). The Two Genealogies as Given by Matthew and Luke.
ì´종근. (2002). 고고Õ™ 논단(#)(#)(#) 고대 ë°â€Ã«Â²Â¨Ã«Â¡Â ë°°ê²½ì—Âì„ÅìÂËœ 족보 ê³µì‹Å성엠관Պ연구. 15–29.
