Do Mormons Believe That Black People Can’t Go To Heaven? (Is There Still Racism in the Mormon Church?)

Today we’re going to talk about something that’s been on people’s hearts and minds: “Do Mormons believe Black people can’t go to heaven?” and “Is there still racism in the Mormon Church?” these are big questions, touching on some sensitive and historical things within The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a church many folks know as the Mormon Church. You see, in the past, there were some rules and teachings about race that, understandably, caused some hurt and confusion for many good people.

But I want you to know, the purpose of this article is to bring light and clarity! We’re going to share clear, well-researched, and easy-to-understand answers, especially for our Christian friends. All the information here comes from official Church statements, historical records, how they understand their scriptures, and what Church members themselves have experienced. Our goal is to help you understand these important topics, not to push a certain view or to judge anyone.

What is the Current Mormon Teaching on Salvation for Black People?

Let me tell you some good news right from the start! The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints today teaches a powerful truth: salvation, that incredible gift of being with God forever, is available to every single person, no matter their race or where they come from. This isn’t just a side note, friends; this is a central, shining principle in how Mormons understand God’s love today.

Core Doctrine of Universal Access

You see, the Church’s teaching right now affirms that God loves all His children—every single one—equally. Your race, your background, the color of your skin—none of that changes how much God loves you or your amazing potential to receive His gift of salvation.¹ They often share a beautiful scripture from their Book of Mormon, 2 Nephi 26:33, which says that God “denieth none that come unto him, black and white, bond and free, male and female; … all are alike unto God”.¹ Isn’t that wonderful? This verse is shared again and again in official Church messages to show their strong belief that God invites every person, everywhere, to come to Him and enjoy His goodness.¹ This message of God’s fairness will sound familiar and encouraging to our Christian readers, much like when the Bible says in Galatians 3:28, “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus,” or in Acts 10:34-35, “Then Peter began to speak: ‘I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right.'” When we see these shared beliefs, it helps us all understand where the Church is coming from with their current, open-armed stance.

Eternal Life and Exaltation

Mormon theology teaches that every single one of us has a divine spark, a potential to return to God’s presence and receive “eternal life.” This is the highest, most glorious form of salvation, and they also call it “exaltation”.¹ And guess what? This ultimate blessing is open to every person who shows faith, turns away from their sins, and chooses to follow God’s commandments and the special rituals of the gospel, which they call ordinances.¹ What’s so important to hear is that current Church doctrine says loud and clear: there are absolutely no racial barriers to reaching the very highest levels of heaven. God’s best is available to all!

Disavowal of Past Theories

This is so important: the Church now officially says that some old ideas and theories from the past, which tried to explain why there were racial restrictions, were not right. These include ideas that Black skin was a sign that God was displeased or that it was a curse, or even that it was because of things that happened before we were born.¹ The Church said a clear “no” to these old ideas, especially in a 2013 Church essay called “Race and the Priesthood.” This was a big, positive step away from those past justifications, and it’s key to understanding where the Church stands today on race and God’s salvation.¹

Focus on the Heart

Today’s teachings shine a light on what truly matters to God. It’s not our outward appearance what’s in our hearts. They teach that “the Lord looketh on the heart,” and that’s how He judges us, based on our inner character and our desire to do good.¹

So, to answer that important question directly: Do Mormons believe Black people can go to heaven? The answer from the current, official teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is a resounding, joyful YES! Black people, just like all people, are believed to have full access to heaven and the very highest degrees of salvation, all based on their individual faith and how they live their lives. The Church’s strong belief in scriptures like 2 Nephi 26:33 gives them a solid foundation for this wonderful, modern view of racial equality in God’s loving eyes.

What Was the “Priesthood and Temple Ban” in Mormon History?

For a long time in its history, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints had a policy that was a heavy burden for some. It restricted men of Black African descent from holding what they call the priesthood. And because of that, it also meant that Black men and women couldn’t participate in certain special ceremonies in their temples. To really understand this, we need to know just how important the priesthood and temples are in the Mormon faith.

• Priesthood: Imagine this: in Mormon belief, the priesthood is seen as God’s own divine power and authority, given to men to act in His name to help all of us on our journey to salvation. They believe it’s absolutely essential for performing sacred rituals, like baptism and giving the Holy Ghost, and also for leadership within the Church. Unlike many Christian churches that have pastors who are paid for their ministry, the LDS Church has what they call a lay priesthood. This means most grown-up male members who are living righteously are given this priesthood authority.⁵
• Temples: Temples, for Mormons, are the most sacred places on earth—they truly believe they are “houses of the Lord.” Inside these beautiful temples, members take part in the highest, most sacred rituals. These include the “endowment,” which is a series of teachings and promises that bring blessings and power, and “sealings,” which are marriages that unite couples not just for this life, but for all eternity, and also join children to their parents in eternal families. These temple ceremonies are considered absolutely vital for reaching “exaltation,” that highest degree of salvation we talked about.⁵

The Ban Explained

So, from 1852 all the way to 1978, men of Black African descent were not given the priesthood.⁷ And because the men couldn’t hold the priesthood, and due to the policies connected to that, Black men and women were also not allowed to participate in those temple endowment ceremonies or be sealed in marriage for eternity.⁵

It’s important to know, though, that individuals of Black African descent could still be baptized, they could still become members of the Church, and they could still receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.⁴ They could even participate in some temple rituals, like baptisms for the dead done by others on their behalf, although there were times when even that was limited.⁵

Historical Origins

How did this ban even start? Well, the history is a bit complicated. During the time of the Church’s founder, Joseph Smith (who passed away in 1844), a few Black men actually were ordained to the priesthood. A man named Elijah Abel is a well-known example; he was ordained as an Elder and later as a Seventy (which is a priesthood office), and he even took part in some early temple rituals.⁷

But then, in 1852, Brigham Young, who became the President of the Church after Joseph Smith, publicly announced the policy that stopped priesthood ordination for men of Black African descent.⁵ The Church’s official statement about the 1978 revelation that ended the ban (it’s called Official Declaration 2), and that “Race and the Priesthood” essay we mentioned, both say that “Church records offer no clear insights into the origins of this practice” before Brigham Young made it official.¹⁰ This official view suggests that the exact reasons why it started aren’t fully known from Church records. It frames it as a policy whose beginnings are a bit of a mystery once it was in place, it needed a new revelation from God to change it. But many historians who have studied this point to Brigham Young’s specific teachings and the common racial attitudes of 19th-century America as big reasons why it was put in place and why it continued for so long.⁸

Theories Used to Justify the Ban (Now Disavowed)

Over the years, different ideas were shared by Church leaders and members to try and explain these priesthood and temple restrictions. But I want you to hear this loud and clear: the Church today says these theories were wrong and does not believe them anymore 1:

• Curse of Cain: One common idea was that people of Black African descent were related to Cain from the Bible, who sadly murdered his brother Abel. Their dark skin was sometimes seen as the “mark of Cain,” and the priesthood restriction was thought to be part of this curse.⁶
• Curse of Ham: Another theory connected the restriction to Noah’s son Ham (or more specifically, Ham’s son Canaan), who was cursed in the Bible story. Some taught that this family line was denied the priesthood.⁵
• Pre-mortal Neutrality: A widely taught idea was that before we came to earth, in a pre-earth life, our spirits made choices about how valiant we were in a “war in heaven.” The idea was that those who were supposedly less brave or neutral in that conflict were born into this life with Black skin and, because of that, were subject to the priesthood restriction.⁸

Impact on Black Members

This priesthood and temple ban had a deep and lasting impact on Black members of the Church 5:

• Limited Church Participation: Without the priesthood, Black men couldn’t lead in ordinances, they couldn’t give blessings of healing or comfort to their families in the same way, and they couldn’t hold most leadership positions in their local congregations or in the wider Church.⁵
• Eternal Family Concerns: Not being able to participate in temple sealings meant that Black members couldn’t have their marriages blessed for eternity or have their children sealed to them in the way other Latter-day Saints could. And remember, in Mormon belief, these temple ordinances are so important for the highest degree of salvation (exaltation) and for families to be together forever.⁵ So, this restriction wasn’t just about earthly things; it was seen as affecting their eternal life and family unity.
• Social and Emotional Toll: The ban, and the theories used to try and explain it, often led to feelings of being left out, deep pain, and being pushed to the margins for Black members. For some, it became a really big hurdle to their faith or to staying active in the Church.¹³

To help us see this journey clearly, here’s a simple timeline:

Table 1: Key Milestones in LDS Church History Regarding Race and Priesthood/Temple Access

Understanding this history is so important for understanding both the past and the present teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints about race. That ban lasted for 126 years, and it was explained with theological ideas that the Church now says are not correct. This created a complex story that the Church is still working through today.

What Did Early Mormon Leaders, Like Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, Teach About Race?

The teachings of early Mormon leaders about race, especially concerning people of Black African descent, were not always the same and they changed over time. These teachings had a big influence on the Church’s policies and its culture for many, many years.

Joseph Smith (Founder, President 1830-1844)

Joseph Smith, the founder of the Church, had views on race and slavery that were complex and didn’t always stay the same throughout his life.⁹

• Early Inclusivity: In the Church’s very first years, Joseph Smith allowed a few Black men to be ordained to the priesthood. We mentioned Elijah Abel, who was a prominent example. He even participated in some early temple rituals, like washings and anointings.⁴ This shows us that, at the start, there wasn’t a complete stop to Black men holding the priesthood.
• Teachings on Curses: Even with this early openness, Joseph Smith also taught that Black people were descendants of Cain and Ham from the Bible, and that their dark skin was connected to these curses.³ Sometimes, he used these ideas to explain the social situation of Black people and even to justify slavery, which reflected common ways people in the 19th century interpreted the Bible.⁹
• Views on Slavery: Joseph Smith’s position on slavery shifted. At first, he spoke against it later, he took a more neutral public stance, especially when the Church was based in Missouri, which was a slave state. He did this to try and avoid conflict.⁹ But near the end of his life, when he was running for U.S. President in 1844, he actually called for ending slavery through a plan where slave owners would be paid.⁹
• Segregation and Potential: Sometimes, Joseph Smith expressed ideas that suggested racial segregation, saying that Black and White people might be better off “separate but legally equal”.⁹ But he also affirmed the humanity and spiritual potential of Black individuals. He said they had souls, they could be saved, and they could achieve great things if they were given the same opportunities as others.⁹

Brigham Young (President 1847-1877)

When Brigham Young became the leader, it marked a big change. He was the one who formally put the priesthood and temple ban into place.

• Implemented the Ban: In 1852, Brigham Young publicly announced that men of Black African descent could no longer be ordained to the priesthood.⁷ This policy also meant that Black men and women couldn’t participate in temple endowments and sealings.
• Racial Justifications: Brigham Young often used the “curse of Cain” and the “curse of Ham” as the main religious reasons for the ban. He taught that the mark of Cain was visible in the dark skin of Africans.⁸ He believed this family line was divinely restricted from holding the priesthood.
• Support for Slavery: Brigham Young was a strong supporter of slavery. He played a key role in passing a law in Utah Territory in 1852 called the “Act in Relation to Service,” which made a form of slavery or indentured servitude legal for Black people in Utah.¹⁸
• Future Hope, Delayed: Even while enforcing the ban, Brigham Young also taught that this restriction was only temporary. He said that Black people would eventually receive the priesthood only after “all the other descendants of Adam have received the promises and enjoyed the blessings of the Priesthood”.¹ Some records suggest he thought this might happen after death.²¹
• Claim of Originality for the Ban: In a speech in 1852, Brigham Young seemed to suggest that this priesthood restriction was his own declaration. He said, “If there never was a prophet or Apostle of Jesus Christ who spoke it before, I tell you this people that are commonly called Negros are the children of Cain, I know they are; I know they cannot bear rule in the priesthood… Thus saith the eternal I Am, what I Am, I take it off at my pleasure”.⁸ This suggests he was establishing a policy that Joseph Smith hadn’t explicitly taught.
• Opposition to Interracial Marriage: Brigham Young was strongly against marriage between Black and White individuals.⁵

John Taylor (President 1880-1887)

John Taylor, who came after Brigham Young, continued the priesthood ban. He, along with other apostles like Orson Hyde and Orson Pratt, supported the idea that was starting to grow: that Black people had been less valiant in that pre-mortal “war in heaven,” and being born into a lineage denied the priesthood was a result of that.³ This idea, even though Brigham Young himself reportedly didn’t agree with it 13, became more popular and was a common reason given for the ban by members and some leaders.

Wilford Woodruff (President 1889-1898) and Lorenzo Snow (President 1898-1901)

Presidents Woodruff and Snow also kept the priesthood and temple restrictions in place. Although they didn’t add a lot of new doctrinal explanations about race that are highlighted in the sources, their leadership upheld the policies that were already established.¹⁴

Joseph F. Smith (President 1901-1918)

President Joseph F. Smith’s time as leader also saw the ban continue. The common justifications, like lineage curses and pre-mortal status, were still part of how the Church talked about it. (The provided information doesn’t detail specific new contributions to the theology of the ban by Joseph F. Smith, other than him upholding the policy.)

Heber J. Grant (President 1918-1945)

President Grant upheld the ban. His First Presidency gave advice to local leaders that sometimes went along with racial segregation. For example, they suggested that Black women members in Washington D.C. Might be “discreetly approached” to sit separately in meetings so it wouldn’t upset some white members.²³ The First Presidency under Grant also said that “social intercourse between the Whites and the Negroes should not be encouraged because of leading to intermarriage, which the Lord has forbidden”.²⁴ Despite this, President Grant also said privately that the restriction was temporary and that a future revelation would eventually lift it.⁷

George Albert Smith (President 1945-1951)

Under President George Albert Smith, the First Presidency (which included J. Reuben Clark and David O. McKay, who were both very influential on this topic) issued a major official statement in 1949. This statement strongly supported the ban, declaring it was “not a matter of the declaration of a policy but of direct commandment from the Lord”.⁸ It directly linked the denial of the priesthood to “the conduct of spirits in the premortal existence,” saying that “Under this principle there is no injustice whatsoever involved in this deprivation”.¹⁵ This 1949 statement really cemented that pre-mortal explanation as an official reason.

David O. McKay (President 1951-1970)

President McKay was president for a long time, and during his leadership, the Church both reinforced the idea that the ban was from God and also made some administrative changes because the Church was growing all over the world.

• He repeated the traditional view, saying, “The seeming discrimination by the Church toward the Negro is not something which originated with man; but goes back into the beginning with God”.⁸ He also taught that Black members shouldn’t worry, because they would eventually receive all the blessings they were meant to have.⁵
• But he also took some steps that showed things were starting to shift a bit on race issues. He stopped an earlier policy that required priesthood holders in racially mixed South Africa to trace their family lines out of Africa. He also authorized priesthood ordination for some groups in the Philippines and Fiji who had previously been restricted.¹ He even thought about starting missionary work in Nigeria.⁵
• On the other hand, in 1952, McKay instructed that Black people should not be invited to speak in priesthood meetings or at Church firesides.⁵ His personal writings also show that he held views that reflected the racial prejudices of his time, like being against school desegregation and suggesting Black people were “better off” under segregation in the American South.²³

The teachings of these leaders show a path. Joseph Smith’s time had some openness alongside teachings about curses. Brigham Young firmly put the ban in place, giving racial and scriptural reasons for it. For over a hundred years, the leaders who followed mostly upheld and added to these reasons, especially the ideas of lineage curses and being less valiant before birth, until that wonderful revelation in 1978. There was an internal shift in these religious explanations, with the pre-mortal theory becoming more prominent, even if the very first leaders who supported the ban didn’t all hold that view. Also, there was a tension between upholding the religious ban and the practical needs of a Church that was growing worldwide. This led to different ways segregation was applied and some early signs of a more universal, welcoming approach.

How and Why Did the Mormon Church End the Priesthood and Temple Ban?

This is a story of hope and change! That long-standing policy, the one that restricted individuals of Black African descent from priesthood ordination and full temple participation, came to an end in 1978. And The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches that this happened because of a divine revelation from God. This event is truly one of the most major and joyful turning points in modern Church history.

The 1978 Revelation (Official Declaration)

On June 1, 1978, something amazing happened. Spencer W. Kimball, who was the President of the Church at the time, along with his counselors in the First Presidency (N. Eldon Tanner and Marion G. Romney) and the members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, met together in the Salt Lake Temple. During this sacred meeting, they reported that they received a revelation they had been waiting for, for a long time.¹ This revelation confirmed that the time had finally come to extend all priesthood and temple blessings to “every faithful, worthy man in the Church…without regard for race or color”.¹¹ What wonderful news!

An official letter announcing this incredible change was sent out on June 8, 1978.¹ Then, in the Church’s General Conference in October 1978, this announcement was formally presented to all the members and they sustained it with a unanimous vote. It has since been added to the Doctrine and Covenants, which is one of the Church’s books of scripture, as “Official Declaration 2”.¹

Role of President Spencer W. Kimball

President Kimball was a true instrument in God’s hands in seeking and receiving this revelation. It’s reported that he had been concerned about the priesthood restriction for many years, even before he became the Church President.¹² Once he became the leader, he made this issue a subject of intense personal study, fasting, and “fervent prayer.” He often spent long hours in the temple, seeking God’s guidance.¹ He also counseled deeply with other General Authorities, encouraging them to study the scriptures and pray about it too, wanting them all to be united in support.¹¹ Some accounts even suggest he felt the previous restriction “may have been a possible error” and had supported earlier, unsuccessful attempts by other leaders to make exceptions or lift parts of the ban.¹² He had a heart full of compassion!

Process Leading to the Revelation

The journey to that 1978 revelation wasn’t quick or easy. It involved a period of deep spiritual seeking and careful thought among the Church’s highest leadership.¹² President Kimball described it as a “laborious process.” It took months of discussion, prayer, and striving for unity within the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. And achieving that unity was so important, because in the Mormon major decisions, especially those considered to be from God or about doctrine, are made with unity.¹¹ The accounts describe a powerful spiritual experience in the temple where the revelation was confirmed to everyone present.²⁶ Imagine the joy and relief!

• Contributing Factors 

      <p> Official Church statements and the historical setting point to several things that helped lead to this earnest seeking for revelation:</p></li>
  <li><strong>Global Expansion of the Church</strong>: The Church was growing so much in different parts of the world, especially in countries with many diverse people, like Brazil. The priesthood restriction created big challenges for sharing the gospel and for welcoming new members in these areas.¹ It became harder and harder to try and figure out who had African ancestry in places where populations were very mixed, and it was pastorally very difficult.¹²</li>
  <li><strong>Faithfulness of Black Members</strong>: Church leaders were deeply touched by the incredible faith, patience, and devotion of Black members all over the world. These wonderful people remained committed to the gospel even though they were denied full priesthood and temple blessings.¹ The dedication of members in places like West Africa, who pleaded for missionaries and for the Church to be established, and the steadfastness of Black members in congregations like the Genesis Group in Salt Lake City, were especially noticed.¹ Their faith was a powerful witness!</li>
  <li><strong>Prophetic Promises</strong>: Leaders were also aware of things said by previous prophets, including Brigham Young, that indicated a time would come when all worthy men would receive the priesthood.¹ They held onto that hope.</li>
  <li><strong>Intense Supplication for Divine Guidance</strong>: Official Declaration 2 itself says that the First Presidency &quot;pleaded long and earnestly in behalf of these, our faithful brethren, spending many hours in the Upper Room of the Temple supplicating the Lord for divine guidance&quot;.¹¹ They were truly seeking God’s will with all their hearts.</li>
  <li><strong>Societal Changes</strong>: Although the Church attributes the change directly to revelation from God, it happened during a time of big changes in the world. There was increased awareness about race, and the Civil Rights Movement was ongoing in the United States and other places.⁴ Public attention, including protests by athletes against Brigham Young University because of the Church&#39;s racial policies, was also part of the background as these internal discussions were happening.⁶</li>

The Church officially frames the end of the ban as a direct act of God, a loving response to the prayers and seeking of His prophet, not just a policy change because of outside social or political pressure.¹¹ The emphasis is on God’s perfect timing and His will. The process also showed the Mormon principle of how the Church is governed by councils, as the revelation was confirmed to and unanimously accepted by the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles before it was announced to the world.¹¹ The impact was immediate and amazing! It not only gave Black men access to priesthood ordination and Black families access to temple blessings it also opened the doors for widespread missionary efforts and incredible Church growth in Africa and other regions with large Black populations.¹² God is good!

How Does the Mormon Church Address Its Past Racial Teachings Today?

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has taken some important steps in recent years to talk about its complex history with race, especially that priesthood and temple ban that was lifted, and the old ideas that were once used to try and explain it.

Official Disavowal of Past Theories

A really key part of how the Church is addressing this today is that they have officially and clearly said that those past racial theories were wrong. In 2013, the Church published an essay on its official website called “Race and the Priesthood.” This essay states something so important: “Today, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, or that it reflects unrighteous actions in a premortal life; that mixed-race marriages are a sin; or that black people or people of any other race or ethnicity are inferior in any way to anyone else”.¹ This is a powerful statement because it directly rejects the main reasons—like the curse of Cain, the curse of Ham, and being unworthy before birth—that were historically used to support those racial restrictions.¹ The essay also acknowledges how hurtful these past theories were.⁴ That’s a step towards healing.

Condemnation of Racism

Current Church leaders are standing up and speaking out, consistently and without any doubt, against all forms of racism, whether from the past or in the present day.¹ President Russell M. Nelson, who is the Church President right has been especially clear and strong. He has called on Church members to “abandon attitudes of prejudice against any group of God’s children” and has said that “Any of us who has prejudice toward another race needs to repent!”.¹ Wow! Other leaders have shared similar messages, encouraging members to “help root out racism”.¹ That’s a call to action for everyone!

Emphasis on Current Doctrine

The Church puts a strong, bright spotlight on its current teaching of universal equality and access to salvation for everyone. That beautiful teaching that “all are alike unto God,” which comes from their Book of Mormon (2 Nephi 26:33), is shared often as the Church’s foundational belief about race.² God’s love is for all!

The Question of a Formal Apology

Although the Church has said that past theories were wrong and has condemned racism, it hasn’t issued a formal institutional apology for the priesthood and temple ban itself, or for the broader history of racial discrimination, in the same way that some other religious groups have done for their own pasts.²⁸ In 2015, Elder Dallin H. Oaks (who is now First Counselor in the First Presidency) said in an interview that the Church “doesn’t seek apologies, and we don’t give them”.²⁹

For some members and people outside the that “Race and the Priesthood” essay, even though it was a big step, doesn’t feel like a full apology. They feel it doesn’t explicitly say that the ban itself was wrong or not from God for its time, and it doesn’t fully detail the suffering that the restriction caused.²⁹ The Church’s approach is to disavow the human explanations for the ban as racist and incorrect, while still saying that the origin of the ban isn’t clearly recorded and that it took a revelation from God to change it.¹¹ This allows the Church to condemn past racist teachings while also holding onto the idea that past prophets were acting according to God’s will as they understood it, even if that understanding wasn’t complete or the policy was temporary. This careful position is something people still discuss, and for some, it’s a source of continued pain.²⁹

Focus on Moving Forward

Church leaders often encourage members to focus on the wonderful revelation we have today and to move forward in unity, rather than dwelling too much on past explanations that were made with what is now described as “limited understanding”.¹ After that 1978 revelation, Elder Bruce R. McConkie, who was a prominent apostle, advised members to “Forget everything that I have said, or what President Brigham Young or President George Q. Cannon or whomsoever has said in days past that is contrary to the present revelation. We spoke with a limited understanding and without the light and knowledge that now has come into the world”.¹ This focus on current revelation is a key way the Church helps people reconcile past teachings with what they believe today. But for some, this call to “forget” or not “speculate” can feel like it doesn’t fully acknowledge the historical impact and the human cost of those past policies.

This table helps us see the amazing shift from past ideas to current teachings:

Table 2: Past Racial Theories vs. Current LDS Church Teachings

This table shows a huge, positive shift in the Church’s public teachings. They’ve moved from explanations that were based on a racial hierarchy to a strong, clear stance on equality and welcoming everyone.

What Do Mormon Scriptures Say About Skin Color and Curses, and How Are These Understood?

The Mormon faith has unique books of scripture—the Book of Mormon and the Pearl of Great Price—and these books have passages that talk about skin color, curses, and family lines. How these verses are understood has changed a lot over time, especially when it comes to how they were applied to people of Black African descent.

• Book of Mormon Passages 

      <p> Several passages in the Book of Mormon talk about a group called Lamanites, who are often compared to another group called Nephites.</p></li>
  <li><strong>2 Nephi 5:21-23</strong>: This is one of the passages people talk about a lot. It says that because the Lamanites &quot;had hardened their hearts against him <a href="">the Lord</a>, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them&quot;.³¹ This &quot;cursing&quot; was because of their wrongdoing and was meant to make them different from the Nephites.³
  
      <ul>
          <li><strong>Historical Interpretation</strong>: For many years, people often took this verse literally. They thought it meant that dark skin was a direct result of a curse from God and a sign that God was displeased or had separated them.³</li>
          <li><strong>Current/Alternative Interpretations</strong>: But today, the Church&#39;s &quot;Race and the Priesthood&quot; essay and many modern Mormon scholars and leaders say that we shouldn&#39;t understand such passages as literal statements that connect skin color with righteousness or as a racial curse.¹ Some suggest that &quot;skin of blackness&quot; could be a metaphor, like a symbol for a spiritual state (maybe spiritual darkness or being separated from God), or it could be a marker of their cultural identity, or even refer to things like their clothing or how they decorated themselves, rather than an actual change in skin color.³³ The Church officially says that the idea of dark skin itself being a sign of God’s disapproval is wrong.¹ God looks at the heart!</li>
      </ul></li>
  <li><strong>Jacob 3:5, 8-9</strong>: The prophet Jacob warns some unrighteous Nephites that if they don&#39;t repent, the Lamanites—even with the &quot;cursing which hath come upon their skins&quot;—will be more righteous than them, and their &quot;skins will be whiter than yours&quot; when they stand before God for judgment.³⁵ This is a complex passage. It acknowledges that &quot;curse&quot; story but uses it to condemn the wickedness of the Nephites, suggesting that true righteousness is more important than physical appearance.⁴</li>
  <li><strong>Alma 3:6-10</strong>: This passage says that &quot;the skins of the Lamanites were dark, according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was a curse upon them because of their transgression&quot;.³⁷ The mark was to keep them separate and to discourage intermarriage with the Nephites, so the Nephites wouldn&#39;t adopt &quot;incorrect traditions&quot;.³² Modern ways of understanding this often emphasize that the &quot;incorrect traditions&quot; and turning away from God were the real problems, not the skin color itself as something inherently bad.³³</li>
  <li><strong>3 Nephi 2:14-16</strong>: This passage describes a time when some Lamanites repented and joined with the Nephites, and &quot;their curse was taken from them, and their skin became white like unto the Nephites; And their young men and their daughters became exceedingly fair&quot;.³⁹
  
      <ul>
          <li><strong>Historical Interpretation</strong>: People often took this as literal proof that skin color could change based on how righteous someone was.³</li>
          <li><strong>Current/Alternative Interpretations</strong>: Today, many understand &quot;white&quot; in this context as a metaphor. They believe it signifies purity, righteousness, or becoming part of the Nephite culture and religion, rather than an instant, literal change in skin color.³⁴</li>
      </ul></li>
  <li>Pearl of Great Price Passages 
  
      <p> The Pearl of Great Price, another book of Mormon scripture, also has verses that were historically used in discussions about race.</p></li>
  <li><strong>Moses 7:8</strong>: This verse says, &quot;a blackness came upon all the children of Canaan, that they were despised among all people&quot;.⁴⁰</li>
  <li><strong>Moses 7:22</strong>: It states that &quot;the seed of Cain were black, and had not place among them <a href="">the other descendants of Adam</a>&quot;.⁴⁰
  
      <ul>
          <li><strong>Historical Interpretation</strong>: These verses were very important to that &quot;curse of Cain&quot; story, linking &quot;blackness&quot; to this family line and forming a scriptural basis for the priesthood restriction.³²</li>
          <li><strong>Current/Alternative Interpretations</strong>: But the Church now says we shouldn&#39;t use these verses to justify racial discrimination or to suggest that God disfavors people because of their skin color.¹ Some scholars suggest that &quot;blackness&quot; here might be symbolic of a spiritual condition, or maybe it was a result of tough environmental factors (like a curse on the land that caused hardship and, as a result, a change in appearance or social status) rather than God directly cursing their skin color.⁴²</li>
      </ul></li>
  <li><strong>Abraham 1:21-27</strong>: This passage describes Pharaoh, a descendant of Ham, as being from a lineage &quot;by which he could not have the right of Priesthood,&quot; and that Noah had &quot;cursed him as pertaining to the Priesthood&quot;.⁴⁴
  
      <ul>
          <li><strong>Historical Interpretation</strong>: This was a key scripture used to support the priesthood ban, linking it to being descended from Ham and a specific priesthood curse on his family line.⁵</li>
          <li><strong>Current/Alternative Interpretations</strong>: Although the text does describe a priesthood restriction based on lineage in that specific ancient time, the wonderful 1978 revelation that extended priesthood to all worthy men is understood to be more important than any such past restrictions for our time today. Modern scholars might focus on the specific ancient context of family lineage claims rather than seeing it as a never-ending racial curse.⁴⁵ The Church says we should not use this passage to support any idea of modern racial inferiority or to justify the past ban based on inherent racial characteristics.¹ God’s blessings are for everyone now!</li>
      </ul></li>
  <li>Current Church Guidance on Interpretation 
  
      <p> The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints now actively warns against using scriptural passages to promote racism or to suggest that any race is naturally better or worse than another.¹ The main message they emphasize is that &quot;all are alike unto God&quot;.² That &quot;Race and the Priesthood&quot; essay clarifies that earlier interpretations that reflected racial &quot;folk beliefs&quot; or 19th-century cultural biases are not official Church doctrine.³ Instead, the focus is on the unifying and inclusive messages found all throughout the scriptures. God wants us to be one!</p></li>

The way these scriptural passages are understood has clearly gone through a big, positive shift within Mormonism. Verses that were once widely used to give a scriptural reason for racial restrictions are now officially disavowed in that context. The emphasis has moved towards understanding them metaphorically, culturally, or spiritually in ways that line up with the Church’s current strong belief in racial equality. Nevertheless, the literal words of these passages are still there in the scriptures, and that presents an ongoing challenge for interpretation and discussion. It requires careful thought and context to reconcile them with modern ethical and theological values. The Book of Mormon itself has many different themes; alongside stories of curses and skin color changes, it strongly promotes God’s universal love and describes times of complete unity where racial or tribal differences (“-ites”) didn’t exist anymore. This shows an internal richness that allows for different ways of emphasizing things over time.²

Is There Still Racism in the Mormon Church Today?

When we ask if racism still exists today within The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, we need to look at a few things: what the Church officially teaches, what the institution is doing, and the real-life experiences of its members, especially Black members.

• Official Stance Against Racism 

      <p> Let me tell you, the Church&#39;s official position is strong and clear: they condemn all forms of racism, without any hesitation. Leaders, including the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, have said again and again, very strongly, that racism goes against God&#39;s teachings.¹ President Russell M. Nelson has been especially direct and powerful, stating, &quot;The Creator of us all calls on each of us to abandon attitudes of prejudice against any group of God’s children. Any of us who has prejudice toward another race needs to repent!&quot;.¹ That’s a powerful call to change hearts! These teachings emphasize love, respecting everyone&#39;s dignity, and the importance of building bridges of understanding between all people.⁴⁶</p></li>
  <li>Church Initiatives 
  
      <p> The Church has started several good initiatives to help create racial harmony and make sure everyone feels included:</p></li>
  <li><strong>Integrated Congregations</strong>: Church congregations (they call them wards and branches) are organized by where people live. This means members usually attend services based on their neighborhood. This naturally helps promote racial and ethnic mixing within local congregations, reflecting the diversity of the community around them.¹ The Church has never had a central rule that required segregated congregations, although sometimes in the past, some local segregation did happen, often because of the way society was at the time.⁴</li>
  <li><strong>Lay Ministry</strong>: The Church has a lay ministry, which means members volunteer to serve in many different roles. This also encourages people from different racial backgrounds to interact. It&#39;s common for members of different races and ethnicities to serve together as teachers, leaders, and in what they call ministering assignments (which means visiting and caring for fellow members).¹ They are serving side-by-side!</li>
  <li><strong>Partnerships and Outreach</strong>: The Church has joined hands with organizations like the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) to work together on important projects related to education, helping those in need, and promoting understanding.¹³ They have also increased their efforts to reach out to Black communities all over the world.¹³</li>
  <li><strong>Educational Resources</strong>: The Church provides lessons, articles, and other materials designed to teach principles of racial harmony, making sure everyone feels they belong, and overcoming prejudice.¹ That &quot;Race and the Priesthood&quot; essay is a key example of an effort to help members learn about this history.¹ Knowledge is power!</li>
  <li>Experiences of Black Mormons 
  
      <p> The experiences of Black members within the Church today are varied, and it’s important to hear their voices:</p></li>
  <li><strong>Positive Experiences</strong>: Many Black Latter-day Saints say they find deep spiritual joy, a strong sense of community, love, and acceptance within the Church.⁴⁷ You’ll often hear them share powerful testimonies about their personal connection to God, the truth they find in the gospel teachings, and the warm welcomes they receive from fellow members.⁴⁸ The Church is actually growing significantly in Africa, with many new temples being built or announced on that continent.¹³ That’s a sign of something good happening!</li>
  <li><strong>Challenges and Lingering Issues</strong>: Despite the Church&#39;s official stance and the positive experiences of many, some Black members still face challenges. These can include hearing racist attitudes or remarks from individual members, experiencing microaggressions (those subtle but hurtful comments), feeling like their culture isn&#39;t always understood, or a lack of understanding about their unique experiences.⁴⁷ That historical legacy of the priesthood and temple ban can also be a source of pain, difficult questions, or discomfort for some Black members and for those who are learning about the Church.³ A 2023 survey of former members in areas with many Latter-day Saints (the &quot;Mormon corridor&quot;) showed that race-related issues were among the top reasons people gave for leaving the Church.³ Some people, both members and observers, feel that the institution could do even more to fully acknowledge and counteract the lasting effects of past discriminatory beliefs and practices.¹³</li>
  <li>Acknowledging Imperfection 
  
      <p> Official Church statements recognize that Latter-day Saints, just like any group of people, &quot;are not immune from the tendency toward racist attitudes and actions&quot;.¹ Leaders advise members to actively guard against racism and to repent if they say or do things that are unkind or hurtful based on race or nationality.¹ This shows an understanding that the effort to get rid of prejudice is an ongoing journey for everyone in the Church community. We’re all works in progress!</p></li>

So, while the official doctrines and the leadership of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints strongly condemn racism and actively promote equality, sometimes there can be a gap between these official teachings and what some Black members experience in their daily lives. These members may still encounter cultural biases or individual prejudice from fellow churchgoers. This highlights a common challenge for any large organization that’s working towards positive social change: making sure that the wonderful institutional ideals are fully reflected in the attitudes and behaviors of all its members. The Church’s approach—using theology, integrated congregations, partnerships, and education—suggests they know that tackling racism requires action on many fronts. Nevertheless, that historical shadow of the priesthood and temple ban, and the teachings once used to support it, is still a major factor in how people talk about race within the Church today, and sometimes it can be a hurdle for Black individuals as they engage with the faith.⁴⁷ But hope is alive, and change is happening!

How Do Mormon Beliefs on Salvation Compare to Mainstream Christian Understandings?

Although the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints proudly calls itself Christian, its teachings about salvation have some unique aspects that are different from, as well as some things that are similar to, what many mainstream Christian denominations (like Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant churches) believe. Let’s explore this with open hearts.

• Mormon Plan of Salvation Overview 

      <p> Latter-day Saints believe in a big, beautiful &quot;plan of salvation&quot; that they say stretches from a life before we were born all the way to our eternal destinies:</p></li>
  <li><strong>Pre-mortal Existence</strong>: They teach that humans are literal spirit children of God the Father, and that we lived with Him in a spiritual state before we came to earth.⁵⁰ Imagine that!</li>
  <li><strong>Mortal Life</strong>: This earthly life is seen as a super important time for us to get a physical body, experience challenges that help us grow, learn by faith, and make choices that will shape our eternal future.</li>
  <li><strong>Afterlife</strong>:
  
      <ul>
          <li><strong>Spirit World</strong>: When we pass from this life, they believe our spirits go to either &quot;paradise&quot; (for those who lived righteously) or &quot;spirit prison&quot; (for those who were disobedient or didn&#39;t have a chance to accept the gospel). There, spirits wait for the resurrection and the final judgment.⁵¹</li>
          <li><strong>Resurrection</strong>: A central, joyful belief is that because of Jesus Christ’s Atonement, every single person who has ever lived will be resurrected! We’ll receive a perfected, immortal physical body. This part of salvation—overcoming physical death—is universal and unconditional, a gift for everyone.⁵² Isn’t that amazing grace?</li>
          <li><strong>Final Judgment</strong>: After resurrection, all individuals will stand before God to be judged according to their actions, their desires, and whether they accepted Christ&#39;s Atonement.⁵¹</li>
          <li><strong>Kingdoms of Glory</strong>: Mormon doctrine teaches that there are three main &quot;kingdoms of glory&quot; in the afterlife: the Celestial, Terrestrial, and Telestial kingdoms. They believe most people will inherit one of these kingdoms, and each one represents a different degree of glory and closeness to God. Even the lowest kingdom is described as a state of glory, far better than anything we can understand on earth, and it’s not usually thought of like the traditional Christian idea of hell as a place of eternal suffering.⁵²</li>
          <li><strong>Exaltation</strong>: The ultimate, highest goal for Latter-day Saints is &quot;exaltation&quot; or &quot;eternal life&quot; in the very highest degree of the Celestial Kingdom. This means becoming like God, living in His presence, and being with one&#39;s family forever and ever. To reach this incredible destiny, they believe it requires faith in Jesus Christ, repenting of sins, being baptized by someone with proper priesthood authority, receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost, participating in sacred temple ordinances (like the endowment and eternal marriage), and &quot;enduring to the end&quot; by faithfully obeying God&#39;s commandments.⁵⁰</li>
      </ul></li>

Role of Grace and Works

• Mormon View: Latter-day Saints believe that salvation from physical death (resurrection) is entirely a gift of God’s grace, made possible only through Christ’s Atonement.⁵² That’s pure grace! Exaltation (that eternal life in God’s presence) is also only possible through the Atonement and grace of Jesus Christ. But they believe this grace is accessed and becomes effective in our lives through our faith, our repentance, and our diligent efforts to obey God’s laws and participate in required ordinances (which they see as our works).⁵⁰ A scripture they often quote is 2 Nephi 25:23: “it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do.” Latter-day Saints often understand this to mean that even after we’ve done our very best, grace is still absolutely essential and makes up the difference, or that grace actually enables and empowers us to do what God asks of us.⁵⁵
• Common Christian Perspectives: Mainstream Christian views on grace and works can vary. Many Protestant traditions strongly emphasize that we are saved “by grace through faith alone” (sola gratia, sola fide). They see good works as the natural result or evidence of true faith and salvation, rather than something we do to earn it.⁵⁰ Catholic and Orthodox traditions also emphasize God’s grace as being primary they generally see a more combined and cooperative role for good works, sacraments, and being part of the Church in the journey of salvation. The Mormon emphasis on specific ordinances performed by their priesthood authority and continued works as being necessary for the highest level of salvation (exaltation) is often seen by other Christians as a major difference from the principle of salvation by grace alone.⁵¹

Universalism

• Mormon View: Mormonism has a form of universalism because it teaches that almost all of humanity will be “saved” into one of those kingdoms of glory.⁵² They believe only a very, very small number of individuals, called “sons of perdition”—those who gain a perfect knowledge of God and Christ and then completely reject and defy Them—are sent to “outer darkness,” which is a state of being without any glory.⁵² This is a more inclusive view of salvation than many traditional Christian models that often teach a clearer division between heaven for believers and hell for unbelievers.
• Mainstream Christianity: Most mainstream Christian denominations traditionally do not believe in universal salvation (the idea that everyone will eventually be reconciled to God and saved). They maintain that eternal separation from God (hell) is a real possibility for those who don’t accept Christ or meet the conditions for salvation as understood in their particular traditions.⁵⁸ While some individual theologians or smaller Christian groups throughout history have supported universalism, it’s not the majority view.⁵⁸

Race and Salvation

• Current Mormon Teaching: As we’ve talked about extensively, current Mormon doctrine says loud and clear that there are no racial barriers to salvation or exaltation. All individuals, no matter their race or ethnicity, are eligible for all the blessings of the gospel, including the very highest degrees of glory, based on their personal worthiness and faithfulness.¹ God’s arms are open to everyone!
• Mainstream Christianity: While many Christian denominations have had their own historical struggles with racism and segregation 24, the main theological principle in most mainstream Christian churches today is that salvation through Jesus Christ is open to all people, without any regard to race. The belief that God doesn’t show favoritism and that all people are equal in His sight is a widely accepted belief, based on wonderful scriptural teachings like Galatians 3:28 (“There is neither Jew nor Gentile… for you are all one in Christ Jesus”) and Colossians 3:11 (“Here there is no Gentile or Jew… but Christ is all, and is in all.”).

A key place where current Mormonism and modern mainstream Christian thought come together beautifully is in saying that race does not affect eligibility for salvation: both affirm that God’s offer of salvation is not limited by race. That’s something to celebrate! But there are still major theological differences concerning the nature of God, what is required to achieve the highest form of salvation (exaltation in Mormonism, which includes the potential to become like God), and the ultimate destiny of most of humankind, with Mormonism suggesting a more tiered and universally inclusive (to some degree of glory) afterlife.

What Can Christian Readers Understand from the Mormon Church’s History with Race?

The journey of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints concerning race offers some valuable insights for Christian readers. It helps us understand how religious institutions can navigate change, interpret their scriptures, and work to bring past practices in line with present values.

• Revelation and Doctrinal Change 

      <p> A core, foundational belief of the LDS Church is &quot;continuing revelation&quot;—this is the idea that God still speaks today and continues to reveal His will and guidance to living prophets.⁷ That incredible 1978 revelation that ended the priesthood and temple ban is held up as a shining example of this principle in action.¹¹ This belief allows for big shifts in policy and practice, which members understand as God-directed updates or corrections. For our Christian friends from denominations that might see core doctrines as more set in stone since the time of the apostles, this concept of ongoing, canon-altering revelation is a key thing that makes Mormonism distinct. It gives them a theological way to explain powerful changes like the one in 1978, seeing it not as giving in to social pressure, but as God leading His Church forward.</p></li>
  <li>Human Fallibility and Prophetic Guidance 
  
      <p> The Church&#39;s disavowal of those past theories used to justify the ban (while not saying the ban itself was a prophetic mistake for its time) suggests they recognize that human leaders, even those they consider prophets, can operate with &quot;limited understanding&quot; or be influenced by the cultural biases of their day, like the racism of the 19th century.¹ The story often shared is that prophets followed what they understood to be God&#39;s will at the time, and when God&#39;s timing was right, He revealed a change. This approach tries to maintain belief in continuous prophetic guidance even when past practices or explanations become problematic by later ethical or doctrinal standards. It’s a careful path of addressing historical wrongs and racism while aiming to protect the perceived integrity of prophetic leadership throughout the Church&#39;s history.</p></li>
  <li>Reconciling Past and Present 
  
      <p> The LDS Church&#39;s efforts, like publishing that &quot;Race and the Priesthood&quot; essay 1, show an institution actively working through challenging parts of its history. It&#39;s an attempt to line up its historical story with its current, strongly held values of equality and inclusion. This process of re-interpreting, disavowing past explanations, and re-emphasizing inclusive doctrines isn&#39;t unique to Mormonism; many religious traditions face the task of re-examining historical elements that conflict with modern ethical insights or changing theological understandings. This shared experience of wrestling with history can be a point of connection for Christian readers, as their own traditions may have faced or continue to face similar challenges in interpreting scripture and history concerning difficult social issues. We’re all on a journey of growth!</p></li>
  <li>Emphasis on Current Teachings 
  
      <p> The LDS Church strongly emphasizes that its current teachings on racial equality and universal salvation are what define its stance today.¹ Leaders encourage everyone to focus on present revelation and the Church&#39;s modern message of inclusivity. For Christian readers who are trying to understand the knowing this emphasis—that present doctrine is considered the most current and authoritative position—is so important.</p></li>
  <li>An Ongoing Journey 
  
      <p> The Church acknowledges that for its members, overcoming all forms of prejudice is an ongoing individual and collective effort.¹ This reflects a universal human challenge that individuals and institutions all face, highlighting that the pursuit of Christ-like love and understanding is a continuous process. We’re all striving to be better!</p></li>

The Mormon experience with race shows how a religious group that believes in ongoing divine guidance can navigate major policy and doctrinal evolution. That 1978 revelation is seen as a divinely directed course correction, allowing the Church to change a long-standing and deeply rooted practice without fundamentally undermining the general authority of past or present leadership in the eyes of its faithful members.

Conclusion

We’ve journeyed together through some deep and important questions about Mormon beliefs regarding race and salvation, and we pray this has brought some light and understanding.

• Current Mormon Doctrine on Salvation for Black People: Let this be clear and joyful: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints unequivocally teaches that Black people, and all people, can achieve the very highest levels of salvation (exaltation) in heaven. Current doctrine holds absolutely no racial restrictions. The Church stands firm on the truth that “all are alike unto God,” and it officially disavows any past theories that suggested Black skin was a sign of God’s disfavor or a curse. God’s love is for everyone!
• Addressing Racism: The Church officially and strongly condemns all forms of racism, whether from the past or in the present. Its leaders have called for a change of heart, for repentance from prejudice, and have started efforts to build greater understanding and inclusion. But the journey to overcome all cultural biases and individual prejudices is an ongoing one, and some Black members still report facing challenges within the Church community. The legacy of past restrictions and teachings remains a complex part of this journey they are moving forward in hope.

That 1978 revelation ending the priesthood and temple ban was a truly momentous occasion, understood by Latter-day Saints as a direct act of God’s love and guidance. It opened the way for full participation for all worthy members and led to amazing global growth, especially in Africa. Although the Church has disavowed the theories used to justify the past ban, it has not issued a formal institutional apology for the ban itself in the same way some other denominations have addressed their histories of racial discrimination. Instead, the focus is on current teachings of equality and the belief in ongoing revelation from a loving God.

For our Christian readers, understanding the Mormon Church’s history with race involves recognizing its belief in continuous revelation, its efforts to reconcile past practices with present values, and its strong emphasis on current doctrine as the most authoritative guide. The journey of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on matters of race, with its painful history and its major, hopeful shifts towards inclusion, reflects broader themes common to many faiths as they strive to live up to their highest ideals of love, equality, and divine justice in an ever-changing world. May we all continue to grow in love and understanding!

Bibliography:

1. Race and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/race-and-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints?lang=eng
2. He Denieth None That Come unto Him – Church History, accessed May 22, 2025, https://history.churchofjesuschrist.org/content/perspectives-on-church-history/he-denieth-none-that-come-unto-him?lang=eng
3. Mormon teachings on skin color – Wikipedia, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_teachings_on_skin_color
4. LDS Gospel Topics Essay: Race and the Priesthood (Annotated), accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.ldsdiscussions.com/priesthood-ban-essay
5. Black people and temple and priesthood policies in the Church of …, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_and_temple_and_priesthood_policies_in_the_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints
6. Why the Mormon Church Finally Let Black Men Into the Priesthood – Time, accessed May 22, 2025, https://time.com/3905811/mormon-priesthood-men-women-integration/
7. 1978 Revelation on Priesthood – Wikipedia, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_Revelation_on_Priesthood
8. My Response to the New Church Essay on Race : r/mormon – Reddit, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/mormon/comments/1jgnp5i/my_response_to_the_new_church_essay_on_race/
9. Joseph Smith’s views on Black people – Wikipedia, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Smith%27s_views_on_Black_people
10. New Church Essay Implies That the Temple and Priesthood Ban was Due to Cultural Bias : r/mormon – Reddit, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/mormon/comments/1jfg44r/new_church_essay_implies_that_the_temple_and/
11. Official Declaration 2 – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/od/2?lang=eng
12. How Was the 1978 Priesthood Revelation a Process? – From the Desk, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.fromthedesk.org/1978-priesthood-revelation-second-class-saints/
13. Black people and Mormonism – Wikipedia, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_and_Mormonism
14. Racial Segregation – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/history/topics/racial-segregation?lang=eng
15. George Albert Smith – wasmormon.org, accessed May 22, 2025, https://wasmormon.org/tag/george-albert-smith/
16. 1949 First Presidency provides a statement on the priesthood and temple restriction for Black Saints to an anonymous correspondent. – B. H. Roberts Foundation, accessed May 22, 2025, https://bhroberts.org/records/0wm3ut-0aK73Q/1949_first_presidency_provides_a_statement_on_the_priesthood_and_temple_restriction_for_black_saints_to_an_anonymous_correspondent
17. Priesthood and Temple Restriction, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/history/topics/priesthood-and-temple-restriction?lang=eng
18. Five Times Mormons Changed Their Position on Slavery – Greg Kofford Books, accessed May 22, 2025, https://gregkofford.com/blogs/news/five-times-mormons-changed-their-position-on-slavery
19. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Smith%27s_views_on_Black_people#:~:text=Smith%20argued%20that%20Black%20and,.%22%20Smith%20opposed%20Black%E2%80%93White
20. Chapter 1: Race, Slavery, and Freedom – Utah: Slaves and Saints – National Park Service, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/chapter-1-race-slavery-and-freedom-utah-slaves-and-saints.htm
21. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_and_Mormonism#:~:text=As%20Smith’s%20successor%2C%20he%20used,receive%20the%20priesthood%20after%20death.
22. Teaching the Priesthood/Temple Ban at BYU – Juvenile Instructor, accessed May 22, 2025, https://juvenileinstructor.org/teaching-the-priesthoodtemple-ban-at-byu/
23. Black segregation and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints – Wikipedia, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_segregation_and_the_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints
24. Racial segregation of churches in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_segregation_of_churches_in_the_United_States
25. David O. McKay Diaries – “Blacks” – Mormon Studies, accessed May 22, 2025, https://mormonstudies.as.virginia.edu/david-o-mckay-diary-excerpts/blacks/
26. Official Declaration 2 | Religious Studies Center – BYU, accessed May 22, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/sperry-symposium-classics-doctrine-covenants/official-declaration-2
27. What is the Church’s stance on racism? – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/new-era/2020/03/questions-and-answers/what-is-the-churchs-stance-on-racism?lang=eng
28. NOT REAL NEWS: False claim of Mormon apology for racism | AP …, accessed May 22, 2025, https://apnews.com/general-news-8453dce99ccf46c2a938a4e65c5addc5
29. Should The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Apologize …, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/should-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints-apologize-for-racism-other-churches-have/
30. The LDS essay on race and the priesthood has a big lie in it. This member discovered the lie and ended up distrusting the church : r/mormon – Reddit, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/mormon/comments/1fq619s/the_lds_essay_on_race_and_the_priesthood_has_a/
31. 2 Nephi 5 – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/2-ne/5?lang=eng
32. Overview of Race in the Scriptures of Mormonism – LDS Discussions, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.ldsdiscussions.com/race
33. The Inclusive, Anti-Discrimination Message of the Book of Mormon, accessed May 22, 2025, https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1272&context=interpreter
34. Questions about 2 Nephi 5.21 and 3 Nephi 2.14-15 – LDS Scripture …, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.ldsscriptureteachings.org/2019/10/questions-about-2-nephi-521-and-3rd-nephi-214-15/
35. Jacob 3 – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/jacob/3?lang=eng
36. The Lamanite Mark | Religious Studies Center, accessed May 22, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/book-mormon-second-nephi-doctrinal-structure/lamanite-mark
37. Alma 3 – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/alma/3?lang=eng
38. Why Did Book of Mormon Prophets Discourage Nephite-Lamanite, accessed May 22, 2025, https://scripturecentral.org/knowhy/why-did-book-of-mormon-prophets-discourage-nephite-lamanite-intermarriage
39. 3 Nephi 2 – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/3-ne/2?lang=eng
40. Moses 7 – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/pgp/moses/7?lang=eng
41. Joseph Fielding Smith’s Evolving Views on Race: The Odyssey of a Mormon Apostle-President – Dialogue Journal, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/joseph-fielding-smiths-evolving-views-on-race-the-odyssey-of-a-mormon-apostle-president/
42. Thoughtful, faithful responses if possible: how do you reconcile …, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/latterdaysaints/comments/7v8qrt/thoughtful_faithful_responses_if_possible_how_do/
43. accessed January 1, 1970, httpss://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1200&context=interpreter
44. Abraham 1 – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/pgp/abr/1?lang=eng
45. The Priesthood Ban and the Book of Abraham – BYU ScholarsArchive, accessed May 22, 2025, https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5257&context=byusq
46. Racial and Cultural Prejudice – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/racial-prejudice?lang=eng
47. Is being black a problem at a LDS church. : r/latterdaysaints – Reddit, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/latterdaysaints/comments/1d09s8w/is_being_black_a_problem_at_a_lds_church/
48. Testimonies – Blacklatterdaysaints.org, accessed May 22, 2025, http://www.blacklatterdaysaints.org/testimonies
49. Experiences of African-American Church Members, accessed May 22, 2025, https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/additional-resource/experiences-of-african-american-church-members
50. 7 Reasons Why Mormonism and Christianity Are Not the Same | Clearly Reformed, accessed May 22, 2025, https://clearlyreformed.org/7-reasons-why-mormonism-and-christianity-are-not-the-same/
51. How does the Mormon Plan of Salvation Compare with the Bible? – Truth in Love Ministry, accessed May 22, 2025, https://tilm.org/how-does-the-plan-of-salvation-lds-compare-with-the-bible/
52. Does Mormon doctrine believe in salvation through works or faith alone? – Reddit, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/mormon/comments/30zdlq/does_mormon_doctrine_believe_in_salvation_through/
53. Is Mormonism Christian? – First Things, accessed May 22, 2025, https://firstthings.com/is-mormonism-christian/
54. The Difference Between Christian Grace and Mormon Grace | Cold Case Christianity, accessed May 22, 2025, https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/the-difference-between-christian-grace-and-mormon-grace/
55. Plan of salvation/Original sin – FAIR Latter-day Saints, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/Plan_of_salvation/Original_sin
56. How are Christians and Mormons Different? – Foundation Worldview, accessed May 22, 2025, https://foundationworldview.com/blog/how-are-christians-and-mormons-different
57. Universalism and the Revelations of Joseph Smith – Religious Studies Center, accessed May 22, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/doctrine-covenants-revelations-context/universalism-revelations-joseph-smith
58. History of Christian universalism – Wikipedia, accessed May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Christian_universalism
59. Distinction and Dispersal: Folk Theology and the Maintenance of White Supremacy, accessed May 22, 2025, https://jsreligion.org/issues/vol17/haynes.html